Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
43 WATSON Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	3NT E	2D	+2		660		-14	14
35 GIBBONS Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	3NT E	TH	+2		660		0	0
33 DRISCOLL Team	41 DAVIES Team	3NT E	2D	+2		660		-2	2
24 SIMPSON Team	9 WARE Team	3NT E	3D	+2		660		1	-1
19 CAMP Team	36 WYLIE Team	3NT E	3S	=		600		-12	12
2 JOHNSTONE Team	38 MOSLEY Team	3NT W	4D	+3		690		0	0
44 BARON Team	14 LACEY Team	3NT W	8D	+4		720		-3	3
39 TIPPETT Team	40 WOODHALL Team	3NT W	7H	+4		720		-3	3
38 MOSLEY Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	3NT W	7H	+3		690		0	0
37 BROWN Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	3NT W	7H	+3		690		-2	2
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	21 CARTNER Team	3NT W	2D	+4		720		12	-12
13 EDGINTON Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	3NT W	9H	+4		720		-2	2
3 FOIDL Team	28 HURLEY Team	3NT W	8D	+4		720		-3	3
10 DEAN Team	18 BOOKER Team	3NT W	5S	+1		630		-12	12
5 SUN Team	25 BURROWS Team	3NT W	7H	+4		720		-3	3
6 CARSON Team	29 YULE Team	3NT W	4D	+4		720		-3	3
9 WARE Team	24 SIMPSON Team	3NT W	9H	+3		690		-1	1
17 DONBAVAND Team	35 GIBBONS Team	4NT E	6D	+1		660		0	0
41 DAVIES Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	5 E	3S	=		600		2	-2
11 HALL Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	5 E	6S	+1		620		-12	12
40 WOODHALL Team	39 TIPPETT Team	5 E	6S	=		600		3	-3
20 KER Team	42 GRANT Team	5 E	3D	=		600		-14	14
23 MCKIRDY Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	5 E	6D	=		600		-15	15
25 BURROWS Team	5 SUN Team	5 E	3S	=		600		3	-3
28 HURLEY Team	3 FOIDL Team	5 E	2S	=		600		3	-3
14 LACEY Team	44 BARON Team	5 W	AS	+1		620		3	-3
30 LIVINGSTON Team	37 BROWN Team	5 W	6H	+1		620		2	-2
29 YULE Team	6 CARSON Team	5 W	AS	=		600		3	-3
7 BADLEY Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	5 W	4D	-2	200			3	-3
26 BLACKBURN Team	13 EDGINTON Team	5NT W	4D	=		660		2	-2
32 DJOROVIC Team	43 WATSON Team	6 E	3D	-3	300			14	-14
8 WALDVOGEL Team	11 HALL Team	6 E	6D	-1	100			12	-12
22 D'ARCY Team	15 OYSTON Team	6 E	6S	-1	100			0	0
21 CARTNER Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	6 E	6D	=		1370		-12	12
18 BOOKER Team	10 DEAN Team	6 E	2D	-1	100			12	-12
12 SOMERVILLE Team	34 WESTOBY Team	6 W	AS	-1	100			0	0
42 GRANT Team	20 KER Team	6 W	AS	-3	300			14	-14
31 HAYWOOD Team	7 BADLEY Team	6NT E	2H	-1	100			-3	3
36 WYLIE Team	19 CAMP Team	6NT E	6D	-1	100			12	-12
4 INGLIS Team	1 WALKER Team	6NT E	2D	-1	100			17	-17
15 OYSTON Team	22 D'ARCY Team	6NT E	3S	-1	100			0	0
34 WESTOBY Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	6NT W	3C	-1	100			0	0
1 WALKER Team	4 INGLIS Team	6NT W	8D	=		1440		-17	17
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	6 E	TD	-5	500			15	-15

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
6 by EW	-5	500	1
6 by EW	-3	300	1
6 by EW	-3	300	1
5 by EW	-2	200	1
6NT by EW	-1	100	1
6NT by EW	-1	100	4
6 by EW	-1	100	3
6 by EW	-1	100	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
5 by EW	=	-600	6
5 by EW	=	-600	1
5 by EW	+1	-620	1
5 by EW	+1	-620	2
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
5NT by EW	=	-660	1
4NT by EW	+1	-660	1
3NT by EW	+2	-660	4
3NT by EW	+3	-690	4
3NT by EW	+4	-720	7
6 by EW	=	-1370	1
6NT by EW	=	-1440	1

Alternative display format