Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 WALKER Team	11 HALL Team	2 E	AC	+3		150		-6	6
2 JOHNSTONE Team	41 DAVIES Team	2 E	7S	+1		110		-5	5
3 FOIDL Team	20 KER Team	1NT W	5H	+1		120		0	0
4 INGLIS Team	43 WATSON Team	2 S	QD	-1		50		4	-4
5 SUN Team	24 SIMPSON Team	3 E	8H	+1		130		-8	8
6 CARSON Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	3NT W	TS	=		600		-11	11
7 BADLEY Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	1NT W	3H	-1	100			6	-6
8 WALDVOGEL Team	35 GIBBONS Team	2NT W	5H	+1		150		-1	1
9 WARE Team	22 D'ARCY Team	3 S	2C	-2		100		-5	5
10 DEAN Team	21 CARTNER Team	1NT W	5H	+3		180		-7	7
11 HALL Team	1 WALKER Team	1NT W	5H	-1	100			6	-6
12 SOMERVILLE Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	3NT E	2H	-1	100			5	-5
13 EDGINTON Team	38 MOSLEY Team	3NT W	5H	=		600		-10	10
14 LACEY Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	2 N	7C	-1		50		1	-1
15 OYSTON Team	39 TIPPETT Team	1NT W	5H	+1		120		0	0
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	3 N	AH	-2		100		9	-9
17 DONBAVAND Team	14 LACEY Team	1NT W	5H	=		90		-1	1
18 BOOKER Team	40 WOODHALL Team	2 E	2H	+1		110		1	-1
19 CAMP Team	44 BARON Team	1NT W	5H	+3		180		-7	7
20 KER Team	3 FOIDL Team	2 E	2S	+2		130		0	0
21 CARTNER Team	10 DEAN Team	1NT W	5H	-1	100			7	-7
22 D'ARCY Team	9 WARE Team	3 E	8H	-1	100			5	-5
23 MCKIRDY Team	6 CARSON Team	3 N	AD	-2		100		11	-11
24 SIMPSON Team	5 SUN Team	3NT W	3H	-2	200			8	-8
25 BURROWS Team	42 GRANT Team	3NT W	5H	-2	200			9	-9
26 BLACKBURN Team	7 BADLEY Team	1NT W	3H	+1		120		-6	6
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	4X N	AS	-3		500		-9	9
28 HURLEY Team	37 BROWN Team	3NT W	5H	-1	100			6	-6
29 YULE Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	1NT W	5H	+1		120		0	0
30 LIVINGSTON Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	2 E	2S	=		90		-5	5
31 HAYWOOD Team	29 YULE Team	2 E	3S	+2		130		0	0
32 DJOROVIC Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	3NT W	3H	-1	100			-5	5
33 DRISCOLL Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	4 E	AC	-3	300			5	-5
34 WESTOBY Team	36 WYLIE Team	2 E	2S	+1		110		-11	11
35 GIBBONS Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	1NT W	3H	+1		120		1	-1
36 WYLIE Team	34 WESTOBY Team	5 E	2H	-4	400			11	-11
37 BROWN Team	28 HURLEY Team	1NT W	3H	+1		120		-6	6
38 MOSLEY Team	13 EDGINTON Team	3 W	KD	=		140		10	-10
39 TIPPETT Team	15 OYSTON Team	3 E	2H	+1		130		0	0
40 WOODHALL Team	18 BOOKER Team	3 E	2H	+1		130		-1	1
41 DAVIES Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	3NT W	3H	-1	100			5	-5
42 GRANT Team	25 BURROWS Team	1NT W	3H	+3		180		-9	9
43 WATSON Team	4 INGLIS Team	1NT W	5H	+3		180		-4	4
44 BARON Team	19 CAMP Team	4 E	2H	-1	100			7	-7

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	-4	400	1
4 by EW	-3	300	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	2
4 by EW	-1	100	1
1NT by EW	-1	100	3
3NT by EW	-1	100	3
3 by EW	-1	100	1
3NT by EW	-1	100	1
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by EW	=	-90	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	1
3 by NS	-2	-100	2
3 by NS	-2	-100	1
2 by EW	+1	-110	3
1NT by EW	+1	-120	6
3 by EW	+1	-130	3
2 by EW	+2	-130	2
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2NT by EW	+1	-150	1
2 by EW	+3	-150	1
1NT by EW	+3	-180	4
4X by NS	-3	-500	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	2

Alternative display format