Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
44 BARON Team	14 LACEY Team	2X N	3H	+2	380			7	-7
2 JOHNSTONE Team	38 MOSLEY Team	4 W	AC	-4	200			7	-7
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	21 CARTNER Team	3 N	AD	=	110			9	-9
36 WYLIE Team	19 CAMP Team	3NT W	2C	-2	100			6	-6
10 DEAN Team	18 BOOKER Team	4X E	6H	-1	100			2	-2
23 MCKIRDY Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	3 E	5D	-2	100			4	-4
14 LACEY Team	44 BARON Team	3NT W	5C	-2	100			-7	7
42 GRANT Team	20 KER Team	2 N	3H	=	90			6	-6
41 DAVIES Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	2 N	3H	=	90			1	-1
37 BROWN Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	2 N	3H	=	90			6	-6
9 WARE Team	24 SIMPSON Team	2 N	3H	=	90			0	0
24 SIMPSON Team	9 WARE Team	2 N	3H	=	90			0	0
4 INGLIS Team	1 WALKER Team	3 E	6H	-1	50			5	-5
33 DRISCOLL Team	41 DAVIES Team	4 E	5D	-1	50			-1	1
26 BLACKBURN Team	13 EDGINTON Team	4 E	5D	-1	50			11	-11
18 BOOKER Team	10 DEAN Team	2 E	5D	-1	50			-2	2
43 WATSON Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	4 N	3H	-1		50		4	-4
8 WALDVOGEL Team	11 HALL Team	1 N	5H	-1		50		0	0
11 HALL Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	3 N	7S	-1		50		0	0
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	1 N	3H	-1		50		-4	4
39 TIPPETT Team	40 WOODHALL Team	1NT E	4C	=		90		1	-1
5 SUN Team	25 BURROWS Team	2 S	8D	-2		100		2	-2
38 MOSLEY Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	4 S	8D	-2		100		-7	7
34 WESTOBY Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	2 S	5H	-2		100		2	-2
29 YULE Team	6 CARSON Team	3 S	3C	-2		100		2	-2
15 OYSTON Team	22 D'ARCY Team	2 E	JC	+1		110		7	-7
3 FOIDL Team	28 HURLEY Team	2 E	TC	+1		110		1	-1
40 WOODHALL Team	39 TIPPETT Team	3 E	6H	=		110		-1	1
31 HAYWOOD Team	7 BADLEY Team	1 E	JC	+2		110		9	-9
35 GIBBONS Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	3 E	6H	+1		130		1	-1
1 WALKER Team	4 INGLIS Team	3 E	JC	+1		130		-5	5
30 LIVINGSTON Team	37 BROWN Team	2 E	5D	+1		140		-6	6
28 HURLEY Team	3 FOIDL Team	2 S	KD	-3		150		-1	1
25 BURROWS Team	5 SUN Team	5 N	AD	-3		150		-2	2
12 SOMERVILLE Team	34 WESTOBY Team	1 N	AD	-3		150		-2	2
6 CARSON Team	29 YULE Team	4 N	7S	-3		150		-2	2
20 KER Team	42 GRANT Team	5 N	AD	-3		150		-6	6
19 CAMP Team	36 WYLIE Team	2NT S	8D	-3		150		-6	6
17 DONBAVAND Team	35 GIBBONS Team	2 E	5S	+3		150		-1	1
32 DJOROVIC Team	43 WATSON Team	3NT N	AD	-4		200		-4	4
21 CARTNER Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	2X S	6D	-2		300		-9	9
22 D'ARCY Team	15 OYSTON Team	3NT W	4H	=		400		-7	7
7 BADLEY Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	2NTX N	AD	-3		500		-9	9
13 EDGINTON Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	5X N	KS	-3		500		-11	11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 8
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2X by NS	+2	380	1
4 by EW	-4	200	1
3 by NS	=	110	1
3 by EW	-2	100	1
3NT by EW	-2	100	2
4X by EW	-1	100	1
2 by NS	=	90	5
3 by EW	-1	50	1
4 by EW	-1	50	2
2 by EW	-1	50	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1
1 by NS	-1	-50	2
4 by NS	-1	-50	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	1
4 by NS	-2	-100	1
3 by NS	-2	-100	1
2 by NS	-2	-100	2
3 by EW	=	-110	1
2 by EW	+1	-110	2
1 by EW	+2	-110	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	2
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
2 by NS	-3	-150	1
5 by NS	-3	-150	2
2NT by NS	-3	-150	1
1 by NS	-3	-150	1
4 by NS	-3	-150	1
2 by EW	+3	-150	1
3NT by NS	-4	-200	1
2X by NS	-2	-300	1
3NT by EW	=	-400	1
5X by NS	-3	-500	1
2NTX by NS	-3	-500	1

Alternative display format