Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 WALKER Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	4X W	KS	+1		690		-14	14
2 JOHNSTONE Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	4 S	KH	-2		100		2	-2
3 FOIDL Team	44 BARON Team	5X W	7H	=		650		-5	5
4 INGLIS Team	42 GRANT Team	4 W	KS	=		420		-13	13
5 SUN Team	35 GIBBONS Team	5X E	KS	=		650		-13	13
6 CARSON Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	2 W	KS	+2		170		-3	3
7 BADLEY Team	41 DAVIES Team	5X W	KS	=		650		-11	11
8 WALDVOGEL Team	43 WATSON Team	4X N	TH	-3		500		-2	2
9 WARE Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	5 N	AS	-1		50		3	-3
10 DEAN Team	39 TIPPETT Team	4 W	KS	=		420		-13	13
11 HALL Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	5 S	6S	=	400			7	-7
12 SOMERVILLE Team	36 WYLIE Team	5 N	QH	-1		50		12	-12
13 EDGINTON Team	40 WOODHALL Team	5 S	AH	=	400			6	-6
14 LACEY Team	28 HURLEY Team	3NT N	5H	-2		100		4	-4
15 OYSTON Team	38 MOSLEY Team	5 S	6S	-1		50		11	-11
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	37 BROWN Team	4 N	2H	-3		150		-2	2
17 DONBAVAND Team	25 BURROWS Team	4X W	KS	+1		690		-11	11
18 BOOKER Team	24 SIMPSON Team	4 E	AD	+1		450		-8	8
19 CAMP Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	4X N	6H	-3		500		-12	12
20 KER Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	5 N	2H	-1		50		-4	4
21 CARTNER Team	34 WESTOBY Team	4X W	6H	=		590		-10	10
22 D'ARCY Team	29 YULE Team	4X E	KS	+1		690		-11	11
23 MCKIRDY Team	1 WALKER Team	5 S	KH	=	400			14	-14
24 SIMPSON Team	18 BOOKER Team	5 N	AS	-2		100		8	-8
25 BURROWS Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	5X N	3H	-1		100		11	-11
26 BLACKBURN Team	6 CARSON Team	5 S	KH	-1		50		3	-3
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	9 WARE Team	4 N	2H	-3		150		-3	3
28 HURLEY Team	14 LACEY Team	4 N	8H	-5		250		-4	4
29 YULE Team	22 D'ARCY Team	4 N	5H	-3		150		11	-11
30 LIVINGSTON Team	19 CAMP Team	4 N	TH	=	130			12	-12
31 HAYWOOD Team	11 HALL Team	1NT N	5H	=	90			-7	7
32 DJOROVIC Team	20 KER Team	5X W	KS	-1	100			4	-4
33 DRISCOLL Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	3 W	KS	+1		170		-2	2
34 WESTOBY Team	21 CARTNER Team	4 N	2H	-3		150		10	-10
35 GIBBONS Team	5 SUN Team	5X W	KS	-1	100			13	-13
36 WYLIE Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	5X W	KS	=		650		-12	12
37 BROWN Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	5 N	TH	-2		100		2	-2
38 MOSLEY Team	15 OYSTON Team	4X W	KS	=		590		-11	11
39 TIPPETT Team	10 DEAN Team	4 S	AH	=	420			13	-13
40 WOODHALL Team	13 EDGINTON Team	4 S	AH	+1	150			-6	6
41 DAVIES Team	7 BADLEY Team	5 S	KH	-2		100		11	-11
42 GRANT Team	4 INGLIS Team	3NT N	7S	+1	430			13	-13
43 WATSON Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	4 W	KS	=		420		2	-2
44 BARON Team	3 FOIDL Team	5 W	AC	=		450		5	-5

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 8
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+1	430	1
4 by NS	=	420	1
5 by NS	=	400	3
4 by NS	+1	150	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
5X by EW	-1	100	2
1NT by NS	=	90	1
5 by NS	-1	-50	1
5 by NS	-1	-50	1
5 by NS	-1	-50	3
3NT by NS	-2	-100	1
5 by NS	-2	-100	2
5 by NS	-2	-100	1
4 by NS	-2	-100	1
5X by NS	-1	-100	1
4 by NS	-3	-150	4
3 by EW	+1	-170	1
2 by EW	+2	-170	1
4 by NS	-5	-250	1
4 by EW	=	-420	3
5 by EW	=	-450	1
4 by EW	+1	-450	1
4X by NS	-3	-500	2
4X by EW	=	-590	2
5X by EW	=	-650	1
5X by EW	=	-650	3
4X by EW	+1	-690	1
4X by EW	+1	-690	2

Alternative display format