Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
26 Gray Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2NT W	4S	+1		150		-1	1
21 McFadyen Team	3 Janisz Team	2 E	3C	+1		110		-5	5
7 Hayward Team	25 Sutton Team	2 E	3C	+1		110		-7	7
9 Campbell Team	27 Ball Team	3 E	3C	+1		130		-1	1
13 Fermor Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	2NT W	KC	+1		150		-8	8
2 Collins Team	20 Dick Team	3 S	AH	=	140			6	-6
35 McArthur Team	17 Clark Team	3 E	QS	=		110		-5	5
28 Gyde Team	10 Wood Team	2NT E	QS	=		120		-8	8
24 Duncan Team	6 Healy Team	3 E	JD	=		110		-2	2
20 Dick Team	2 Collins Team	3 E	JS	=		110		-6	6
19 Brewer Team	1 Crichton Team	3 E	3S	=		110		-5	5
11 Yeomans Team	29 Sim Team	2 E	QS	=		90		-9	9
8 Tislevoll Team	26 Gray Team	3 E	QS	=		110		1	-1
36 Butler Team	18 Hutton Team	2NT W	4S	-1	100			-3	3
1 Crichton Team	19 Brewer Team	2 E	3C	-1	100			5	-5
34 Skousgaard Team	16 McAllister Team	4 E	QS	-1	100			5	-5
3 Janisz Team	21 McFadyen Team	3 E	3C	-1	100			5	-5
6 Healy Team	24 Duncan Team	3 S	AH	-1		50		2	-2
17 Clark Team	35 McArthur Team	2NT W	9S	-1	100			5	-5
18 Hutton Team	36 Butler Team	3NT E	TH	-2	200			3	-3
14 Melville Team	32 Brookes Team	2 S	AH	-2		100		0	0
15 De Luca Team	33 Gordon Team	4 E	3C	-2	200			0	0
33 Gordon Team	15 De Luca Team	4 E	TH	-2	200			0	0
32 Brookes Team	14 Melville Team	4 S	AH	-2		100		0	0
31 Jurgeleit Team	13 Fermor Team	3NT W	AS	-2	200			8	-8
30 Kiss Team	12 Cartner Team	2 N	5S	-2		100		2	-2
16 McAllister Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3 S	AH	-2		100		-5	5
27 Ball Team	9 Campbell Team	4 S	AH	-2		100		1	-1
25 Sutton Team	7 Hayward Team	3NT W	KC	-2	200			7	-7
5 Brown Team	23 Moore Team	3 E	3C	-2	200			-3	3
22 Jackson Team	4 Smith Team	3 S	QH	-2		100		2	-2
10 Wood Team	28 Gyde Team	3NT W	KC	-2	200			8	-8
29 Sim Team	11 Yeomans Team	2NT W	4S	-3	300			9	-9
4 Smith Team	22 Jackson Team	4 S	AH	-3		150		-2	2
23 Moore Team	5 Brown Team	3 E	3C	-3	300			3	-3
12 Cartner Team	30 Kiss Team	2 N	8S	-3		150		-2	2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 6
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NT by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-2	200	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
4 by EW	-2	200	2
3NT by EW	-2	200	3
3 by NS	=	140	1
4 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
2NT by EW	-1	100	2
3 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by EW	=	-90	1
2 by NS	-2	-100	1
3 by NS	-2	-100	2
4 by NS	-2	-100	2
2 by NS	-2	-100	1
3 by EW	=	-110	5
2 by EW	+1	-110	2
2NT by EW	=	-120	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
2 by NS	-3	-150	1
4 by NS	-3	-150	1
2NT by EW	+1	-150	2

Alternative display format