Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
11 Yeomans Team	29 Sim Team	2 E	QS	=		90		-9	9
28 Gyde Team	10 Wood Team	2NT E	QS	=		120		-8	8
13 Fermor Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	2NT W	KC	+1		150		-8	8
7 Hayward Team	25 Sutton Team	2 E	3C	+1		110		-7	7
20 Dick Team	2 Collins Team	3 E	JS	=		110		-6	6
35 McArthur Team	17 Clark Team	3 E	QS	=		110		-5	5
21 McFadyen Team	3 Janisz Team	2 E	3C	+1		110		-5	5
19 Brewer Team	1 Crichton Team	3 E	3S	=		110		-5	5
16 McAllister Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3 S	AH	-2		100		-5	5
36 Butler Team	18 Hutton Team	2NT W	4S	-1	100			-3	3
5 Brown Team	23 Moore Team	3 E	3C	-2	200			-3	3
12 Cartner Team	30 Kiss Team	2 N	8S	-3		150		-2	2
24 Duncan Team	6 Healy Team	3 E	JD	=		110		-2	2
4 Smith Team	22 Jackson Team	4 S	AH	-3		150		-2	2
9 Campbell Team	27 Ball Team	3 E	3C	+1		130		-1	1
26 Gray Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2NT W	4S	+1		150		-1	1
15 De Luca Team	33 Gordon Team	4 E	3C	-2	200			0	0
33 Gordon Team	15 De Luca Team	4 E	TH	-2	200			0	0
32 Brookes Team	14 Melville Team	4 S	AH	-2		100		0	0
14 Melville Team	32 Brookes Team	2 S	AH	-2		100		0	0
8 Tislevoll Team	26 Gray Team	3 E	QS	=		110		1	-1
27 Ball Team	9 Campbell Team	4 S	AH	-2		100		1	-1
22 Jackson Team	4 Smith Team	3 S	QH	-2		100		2	-2
6 Healy Team	24 Duncan Team	3 S	AH	-1		50		2	-2
30 Kiss Team	12 Cartner Team	2 N	5S	-2		100		2	-2
23 Moore Team	5 Brown Team	3 E	3C	-3	300			3	-3
18 Hutton Team	36 Butler Team	3NT E	TH	-2	200			3	-3
3 Janisz Team	21 McFadyen Team	3 E	3C	-1	100			5	-5
17 Clark Team	35 McArthur Team	2NT W	9S	-1	100			5	-5
34 Skousgaard Team	16 McAllister Team	4 E	QS	-1	100			5	-5
1 Crichton Team	19 Brewer Team	2 E	3C	-1	100			5	-5
2 Collins Team	20 Dick Team	3 S	AH	=	140			6	-6
25 Sutton Team	7 Hayward Team	3NT W	KC	-2	200			7	-7
10 Wood Team	28 Gyde Team	3NT W	KC	-2	200			8	-8
31 Jurgeleit Team	13 Fermor Team	3NT W	AS	-2	200			8	-8
29 Sim Team	11 Yeomans Team	2NT W	4S	-3	300			9	-9

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 6
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NT by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-2	200	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
4 by EW	-2	200	2
3NT by EW	-2	200	3
3 by NS	=	140	1
4 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
2NT by EW	-1	100	2
3 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by EW	=	-90	1
2 by NS	-2	-100	1
3 by NS	-2	-100	2
4 by NS	-2	-100	2
2 by NS	-2	-100	1
3 by EW	=	-110	5
2 by EW	+1	-110	2
2NT by EW	=	-120	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
2 by NS	-3	-150	1
4 by NS	-3	-150	1
2NT by EW	+1	-150	2

Alternative display format