Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 Yule Team	9 Miao Team	4 W	2C	+1		650		0	0
2 Turner Team	8 Robinson Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
3 Buzzard Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
4 Pemberton Team	6 Malthus Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		4	-4
5 van Wijngaarden Team	3 Buzzard Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
6 Malthus Team	4 Pemberton Team	4X S	TH	-3		800		-4	4
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
8 Robinson Team	2 Turner Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
9 Miao Team	1 Yule Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
10 Tislevoll Team	11 Johnstone Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
11 Johnstone Team	10 Tislevoll Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
12 Grant Team	21 Davies Team	4 E	6H	+1		650		0	0
13 Bartoli Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
14 Dowling Team	24 Gordon Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
15 Curnow Team	20 Luoni Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
16 Monaghan Team	27 Gray Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
17 Bott Team	22 Foidl Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
18 Abraham Team	28 Lovell Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
19 Young Team	26 Watson Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
20 Luoni Team	15 Curnow Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
21 Davies Team	12 Grant Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
22 Foidl Team	17 Bott Team	5 E	QC	=		650		0	0
23 Roggeveen Team	25 Richardson Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		-13	13
24 Gordon Team	14 Dowling Team	4 E	2D	+1		650		0	0
25 Richardson Team	23 Roggeveen Team	6 E	QC	-1	100			13	-13
26 Watson Team	19 Young Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
27 Gray Team	16 Monaghan Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0
28 Lovell Team	18 Abraham Team	4 E	QC	+1		650		0	0

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 4
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
6 by EW	-1	100	1
5 by EW	=	-650	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	24
4X by NS	-3	-800	1

Alternative display format