Boards Results

NORTH ISLAND TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 32
Dealer: W, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 40

Go to Previous Board          Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

23 MCKIRDY Team 17 DONBAVAND Team 5 N 7H -1 50 -4 4

44 BARON Team 41 DAVIES Team 3 N 8D +1 130 1 -1

24 SIMPSON Team 27 TUMILOWICZ Team 4 N 8D = 130 1 -1

3 FOIDL Team 29 YULE Team 4 E 9C -2 200 3 -3

16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 11 HALL Team 4X E 9D -2 500 7 -7

5 SUN Team 37 BROWN Team 3 W 9S -1 100 0 0

9 WARE Team 36 WYLIE Team 3 W 9S = 140 -6 6

1 WALKER Team 14 LACEY Team 2 W AC +1 140 4 -4

4 INGLIS Team 18 BOOKER Team 2 W AC +1 140 -8 8

40 WOODHALL Team 26 BLACKBURN Team 3 W AC -1 100 4 -4

39 TIPPETT Team 21 CARTNER Team 2 W AC = 110 0 0

35 GIBBONS Team 7 BADLEY Team 2 W AC -1 100 9 -9

34 WESTOBY Team 8 WALDVOGEL Team 2 W AC = 110 -5 5

33 DRISCOLL Team 22 D'ARCY Team 3 W AC = 140 -7 7

31 HAYWOOD Team 19 CAMP Team 4 W AC -2 200 3 -3

27 TUMILOWICZ Team 24 SIMPSON Team 3 W AC -1 100 -1 1

25 BURROWS Team 2 JOHNSTONE Team 4X W AC -1 200 3 -3

19 CAMP Team 31 HAYWOOD Team 3 W AC -1 100 -3 3

18 BOOKER Team 4 INGLIS Team 4 W AC -2 200 8 -8

17 DONBAVAND Team 23 MCKIRDY Team 3 W AC -1 100 4 -4

8 WALDVOGEL Team 34 WESTOBY Team 3 W AC -1 100 5 -5

13 EDGINTON Team 43 WATSON Team 2 W AC = 110 -7 7

32 DJOROVIC Team 38 MOSLEY Team 4 S JS -1 50 6 -6

21 CARTNER Team 39 TIPPETT Team 2 W KC = 110 0 0

28 HURLEY Team 10 DEAN Team 3 W KC -1 100 -3 3

29 YULE Team 3 FOIDL Team 3 W KC -1 100 -3 3

10 DEAN Team 28 HURLEY Team 4 W KC -2 200 3 -3

12 SOMERVILLE Team 6 CARSON Team 3 W KC -1 100 5 -5

6 CARSON Team 12 SOMERVILLE Team 4 N KS -2 100 -5 5

41 DAVIES Team 44 BARON Team 3 N KS = 110 -1 1

7 BADLEY Team 35 GIBBONS Team 5X N KS -2 300 -9 9

38 MOSLEY Team 32 DJOROVIC Team 5X N KS -2 300 -6 6

36 WYLIE Team 9 WARE Team 3 N KS = 110 6 -6

26 BLACKBURN Team 40 WOODHALL Team 4 N KS -1 50 -4 4

2 JOHNSTONE Team 25 BURROWS Team 3 N KS = 110 -3 3

14 LACEY Team 1 WALKER Team 5X N QS -2 300 -4 4

22 D'ARCY Team 33 DRISCOLL Team 3 N QS +1 130 7 -7

11 HALL Team 16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 4 E TC -2 200 -7 7

37 BROWN Team 5 SUN Team 3 E TC -1 100 0 0

15 OYSTON Team 20 KER Team 3 E TC -1 100 0 0

42 GRANT Team 30 LIVINGSTON Team 2 E TC = 110 -5 5

43 WATSON Team 13 EDGINTON Team 4 E TC -2 200 7 -7

20 KER Team 15 OYSTON Team 3 E TC -1 100 0 0

30 LIVINGSTON Team 42 GRANT Team 3 W TH -1 100 5 -5

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board          Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 32
Contract Result Score Frequency
4X by EW -2 500 1
4 by EW -2 200 3
4 by EW -2 200 3
4X by EW -1 200 1
4 by NS = 130 1
3 by NS +1 130 2
3 by NS = 110 3
3 by EW -1 100 3
2 by EW -1 100 1
3 by EW -1 100 10
5 by NS -1 -50 1
4 by NS -1 -50 1
4 by NS -1 -50 1
4 by NS -2 -100 1
2 by EW = -110 4
2 by EW = -110 1
3 by EW = -140 2
2 by EW +1 -140 2
5X by NS -2 -300 3

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
23 MCKIRDY Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	5 N	7H	-1		50	-4	4
44 BARON Team	41 DAVIES Team	3 N	8D	+1	130		1	-1
24 SIMPSON Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	4 N	8D	=	130		1	-1
3 FOIDL Team	29 YULE Team	4 E	9C	-2	200		3	-3
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	11 HALL Team	4X E	9D	-2	500		7	-7
5 SUN Team	37 BROWN Team	3 W	9S	-1	100		0	0
9 WARE Team	36 WYLIE Team	3 W	9S	=		140	-6	6
1 WALKER Team	14 LACEY Team	2 W	AC	+1		140	4	-4
4 INGLIS Team	18 BOOKER Team	2 W	AC	+1		140	-8	8
40 WOODHALL Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	3 W	AC	-1	100		4	-4
39 TIPPETT Team	21 CARTNER Team	2 W	AC	=		110	0	0
35 GIBBONS Team	7 BADLEY Team	2 W	AC	-1	100		9	-9
34 WESTOBY Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	2 W	AC	=		110	-5	5
33 DRISCOLL Team	22 D'ARCY Team	3 W	AC	=		140	-7	7
31 HAYWOOD Team	19 CAMP Team	4 W	AC	-2	200		3	-3
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	24 SIMPSON Team	3 W	AC	-1	100		-1	1
25 BURROWS Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	4X W	AC	-1	200		3	-3
19 CAMP Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	3 W	AC	-1	100		-3	3
18 BOOKER Team	4 INGLIS Team	4 W	AC	-2	200		8	-8
17 DONBAVAND Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	3 W	AC	-1	100		4	-4
8 WALDVOGEL Team	34 WESTOBY Team	3 W	AC	-1	100		5	-5
13 EDGINTON Team	43 WATSON Team	2 W	AC	=		110	-7	7
32 DJOROVIC Team	38 MOSLEY Team	4 S	JS	-1		50	6	-6
21 CARTNER Team	39 TIPPETT Team	2 W	KC	=		110	0	0
28 HURLEY Team	10 DEAN Team	3 W	KC	-1	100		-3	3
29 YULE Team	3 FOIDL Team	3 W	KC	-1	100		-3	3
10 DEAN Team	28 HURLEY Team	4 W	KC	-2	200		3	-3
12 SOMERVILLE Team	6 CARSON Team	3 W	KC	-1	100		5	-5
6 CARSON Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	4 N	KS	-2		100	-5	5
41 DAVIES Team	44 BARON Team	3 N	KS	=	110		-1	1
7 BADLEY Team	35 GIBBONS Team	5X N	KS	-2		300	-9	9
38 MOSLEY Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	5X N	KS	-2		300	-6	6
36 WYLIE Team	9 WARE Team	3 N	KS	=	110		6	-6
26 BLACKBURN Team	40 WOODHALL Team	4 N	KS	-1		50	-4	4
2 JOHNSTONE Team	25 BURROWS Team	3 N	KS	=	110		-3	3
14 LACEY Team	1 WALKER Team	5X N	QS	-2		300	-4	4
22 D'ARCY Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	3 N	QS	+1	130		7	-7
11 HALL Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	4 E	TC	-2	200		-7	7
37 BROWN Team	5 SUN Team	3 E	TC	-1	100		0	0
15 OYSTON Team	20 KER Team	3 E	TC	-1	100		0	0
42 GRANT Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	2 E	TC	=		110	-5	5
43 WATSON Team	13 EDGINTON Team	4 E	TC	-2	200		7	-7
20 KER Team	15 OYSTON Team	3 E	TC	-1	100		0	0
30 LIVINGSTON Team	42 GRANT Team	3 W	TH	-1	100		5	-5

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 32
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4X by EW	-2	500	1
4 by EW	-2	200	3
4 by EW	-2	200	3
4X by EW	-1	200	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
3 by NS	+1	130	2
3 by NS	=	110	3
3 by EW	-1	100	3
2 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	-1	100	10
5 by NS	-1	-50	1
4 by NS	-1	-50	1
4 by NS	-1	-50	1
4 by NS	-2	-100	1
2 by EW	=	-110	4
2 by EW	=	-110	1
3 by EW	=	-140	2
2 by EW	+1	-140	2
5X by NS	-2	-300	3