Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
5 HUMPHREY	14 WIGGINS	4 N	TD	=	420			10	-10
6 EDGINTON	4 LENNON	4 N	TD	=	420			10	-10
10 MIAO	13 BURROWS	4 N	KC	=	420			14	-14
12 WARE	11 HODGE	4 S	KD	=	420			10	-10
9 TUMILOWICZ	1 FISHER	6X E	AH	-1	200			7	-7
2 WEHIPEIHANA	8 WHYTE	5 N	KC	-1		50		2	-2
4 LENNON	6 EDGINTON	5 N	TD	-1		50		-10	10
11 HODGE	12 WARE	5 N	TD	-1		50		-10	10
14 WIGGINS	5 HUMPHREY	5 N	KD	-1		50		-10	10
1 FISHER	9 TUMILOWICZ	6 N	KC	-2		100		-7	7
8 WHYTE	2 WEHIPEIHANA	5X N	AS	-1		100		-2	2
3 LIVINGSTON	7 ZHANG	6X N	TD	-2		300		0	0
7 ZHANG	3 LIVINGSTON	6X N	KC	-2		300		0	0
13 BURROWS	10 MIAO	4 E	AH	=		620		-14	14

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

BOARD 3
BD: 3	62	Dlr: S
	KQJT965	Vul: EW
	65
	AJ
K5		AQ983
8
KQJ732		T9
T965		KQ8743
	JT74
	A7432
	A84
	2
NT N - - 4 - 3     11   S - - 4 - 3   9   11 E 5 4 - 3 -     9   W 5 4 - 3 -

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 3
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by NS	=	420	3
4 by NS	=	420	1
6X by EW	-1	200	1
5 by NS	-1	-50	4
6 by NS	-2	-100	1
5X by NS	-1	-100	1
6X by NS	-2	-300	2
4 by EW	=	-620	1

Alternative display format