Boards Results

NORTH ISLAND TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 29
Dealer: N, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 50

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

20 KER Team 9 WARE Team 2 E AH -1 100 -3 3

3 FOIDL Team 11 HALL Team 2 E KC = 110 -6 6

39 TIPPETT Team 25 BURROWS Team 2 E 8S -1 100 5 -5

21 CARTNER Team 1 WALKER Team 2 E 9S = 110 3 -3

34 WESTOBY Team 23 MCKIRDY Team 2 E KC = 110 -14 14

32 DJOROVIC Team 27 TUMILOWICZ Team 2 E KC = 110 -9 9

29 YULE Team 37 BROWN Team 2 E AH -2 200 2 -2

11 HALL Team 3 FOIDL Team 2 N JH +1 140 6 -6

19 CAMP Team 18 BOOKER Team 2 N 5C = 110 -1 1

18 BOOKER Team 19 CAMP Team 2 N 2C +1 140 1 -1

26 BLACKBURN Team 4 INGLIS Team 2 N JH +1 140 1 -1

30 LIVINGSTON Team 24 SIMPSON Team 2 N JH +1 140 0 0

13 EDGINTON Team 33 DRISCOLL Team 2 N 4C +1 140 0 0

33 DRISCOLL Team 13 EDGINTON Team 2 N JH +1 140 0 0

37 BROWN Team 29 YULE Team 2 N TH +1 140 -2 2

5 SUN Team 15 OYSTON Team 2 N JH +1 140 6 -6

36 WYLIE Team 8 WALDVOGEL Team 2 S 6H +1 140 0 0

31 HAYWOOD Team 44 BARON Team 3 W JD = 110 -7 7

2 JOHNSTONE Team 40 WOODHALL Team 3 W JD -2 200 3 -3

44 BARON Team 31 HAYWOOD Team 3 W JD -2 200 7 -7

7 BADLEY Team 14 LACEY Team 3 W JD = 110 5 -5

41 DAVIES Team 28 HURLEY Team 3 S QC -1 100 0 0

15 OYSTON Team 5 SUN Team 3 S QH -1 100 -6 6

6 CARSON Team 42 GRANT Team 3 S 6H -1 100 -5 5

35 GIBBONS Team 38 MOSLEY Team 3 S 6H = 110 7 -7

17 DONBAVAND Team 10 DEAN Team 3 S 6H = 110 -2 2

22 D'ARCY Team 16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 3 E AD = 140 -6 6

43 WATSON Team 12 SOMERVILLE Team 3 E AD -1 100 -1 1

42 GRANT Team 6 CARSON Team 3 E 3S -1 100 5 -5

16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 22 D'ARCY Team 3 E AD -1 100 6 -6

40 WOODHALL Team 2 JOHNSTONE Team 3 E AH -1 100 -3 3

4 INGLIS Team 26 BLACKBURN Team 3 E AD -1 100 -1 1

9 WARE Team 20 KER Team 3X E 2S -1 200 3 -3

10 DEAN Team 17 DONBAVAND Team 3 N JH +1 170 2 -2

12 SOMERVILLE Team 43 WATSON Team 3 N 4C = 140 1 -1

24 SIMPSON Team 30 LIVINGSTON Team 3 N 5C = 140 0 0

1 WALKER Team 21 CARTNER Team 3 N 5C -2 200 -3 3

8 WALDVOGEL Team 36 WYLIE Team 3 S 7D = 140 0 0

28 HURLEY Team 41 DAVIES Team 3 S QC -1 100 0 0

27 TUMILOWICZ Team 32 DJOROVIC Team 4 W JD -3 300 9 -9

23 MCKIRDY Team 34 WESTOBY Team 4X W JD -3 800 14 -14

25 BURROWS Team 39 TIPPETT Team 4 N 5C -1 100 -5 5

14 LACEY Team 7 BADLEY Team 4 S QC -3 300 -5 5

38 MOSLEY Team 35 GIBBONS Team 5 S QC -2 200 -7 7

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract Result Score Frequency
4X by EW -3 800 1
4 by EW -3 300 1
3 by EW -2 200 2
2 by EW -2 200 1
3X by EW -1 200 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
3 by NS = 140 2
3 by NS = 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 8
3 by NS = 110 2
2 by NS = 110 1
2 by EW -1 100 2
3 by EW -1 100 5
3 by NS -1 -100 3
4 by NS -1 -100 1
3 by NS -1 -100 1
3 by EW = -110 2
2 by EW = -110 4
3 by EW = -140 1
3 by NS -2 -200 1
5 by NS -2 -200 1
4 by NS -3 -300 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
20 KER Team	9 WARE Team	2 E	AH	-1	100		-3	3
3 FOIDL Team	11 HALL Team	2 E	KC	=		110	-6	6
39 TIPPETT Team	25 BURROWS Team	2 E	8S	-1	100		5	-5
21 CARTNER Team	1 WALKER Team	2 E	9S	=		110	3	-3
34 WESTOBY Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	2 E	KC	=		110	-14	14
32 DJOROVIC Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	2 E	KC	=		110	-9	9
29 YULE Team	37 BROWN Team	2 E	AH	-2	200		2	-2
11 HALL Team	3 FOIDL Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		6	-6
19 CAMP Team	18 BOOKER Team	2 N	5C	=	110		-1	1
18 BOOKER Team	19 CAMP Team	2 N	2C	+1	140		1	-1
26 BLACKBURN Team	4 INGLIS Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		1	-1
30 LIVINGSTON Team	24 SIMPSON Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		0	0
13 EDGINTON Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	2 N	4C	+1	140		0	0
33 DRISCOLL Team	13 EDGINTON Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		0	0
37 BROWN Team	29 YULE Team	2 N	TH	+1	140		-2	2
5 SUN Team	15 OYSTON Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		6	-6
36 WYLIE Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	2 S	6H	+1	140		0	0
31 HAYWOOD Team	44 BARON Team	3 W	JD	=		110	-7	7
2 JOHNSTONE Team	40 WOODHALL Team	3 W	JD	-2	200		3	-3
44 BARON Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	3 W	JD	-2	200		7	-7
7 BADLEY Team	14 LACEY Team	3 W	JD	=		110	5	-5
41 DAVIES Team	28 HURLEY Team	3 S	QC	-1		100	0	0
15 OYSTON Team	5 SUN Team	3 S	QH	-1		100	-6	6
6 CARSON Team	42 GRANT Team	3 S	6H	-1		100	-5	5
35 GIBBONS Team	38 MOSLEY Team	3 S	6H	=	110		7	-7
17 DONBAVAND Team	10 DEAN Team	3 S	6H	=	110		-2	2
22 D'ARCY Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	3 E	AD	=		140	-6	6
43 WATSON Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	3 E	AD	-1	100		-1	1
42 GRANT Team	6 CARSON Team	3 E	3S	-1	100		5	-5
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	22 D'ARCY Team	3 E	AD	-1	100		6	-6
40 WOODHALL Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	3 E	AH	-1	100		-3	3
4 INGLIS Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	3 E	AD	-1	100		-1	1
9 WARE Team	20 KER Team	3X E	2S	-1	200		3	-3
10 DEAN Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	3 N	JH	+1	170		2	-2
12 SOMERVILLE Team	43 WATSON Team	3 N	4C	=	140		1	-1
24 SIMPSON Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	3 N	5C	=	140		0	0
1 WALKER Team	21 CARTNER Team	3 N	5C	-2		200	-3	3
8 WALDVOGEL Team	36 WYLIE Team	3 S	7D	=	140		0	0
28 HURLEY Team	41 DAVIES Team	3 S	QC	-1		100	0	0
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	4 W	JD	-3	300		9	-9
23 MCKIRDY Team	34 WESTOBY Team	4X W	JD	-3	800		14	-14
25 BURROWS Team	39 TIPPETT Team	4 N	5C	-1		100	-5	5
14 LACEY Team	7 BADLEY Team	4 S	QC	-3		300	-5	5
38 MOSLEY Team	35 GIBBONS Team	5 S	QC	-2		200	-7	7

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4X by EW	-3	800	1
4 by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-2	200	2
2 by EW	-2	200	1
3X by EW	-1	200	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
3 by NS	=	140	2
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	8
3 by NS	=	110	2
2 by NS	=	110	1
2 by EW	-1	100	2
3 by EW	-1	100	5
3 by NS	-1	-100	3
4 by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by EW	=	-110	2
2 by EW	=	-110	4
3 by EW	=	-140	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
4 by NS	-3	-300	1