Boards Results

NORTH ISLAND TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 28
Dealer: W, Vul: NS, Room Datum: 420

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 WALKER Team 21 CARTNER Team 2 S 2C +2 170 -2 2

3 FOIDL Team 11 HALL Team 4 S 2C = 620 0 0

42 GRANT Team 6 CARSON Team 4 S 2C = 620 -1 1

25 BURROWS Team 39 TIPPETT Team 4 S 2C = 620 10 -10

39 TIPPETT Team 25 BURROWS Team 2 S 2C +2 170 -10 10

26 BLACKBURN Team 4 INGLIS Team 2 S 2C +3 200 -9 9

8 WALDVOGEL Team 36 WYLIE Team 4 S 2C = 620 -1 1

33 DRISCOLL Team 13 EDGINTON Team 2 N 2C +2 170 7 -7

36 WYLIE Team 8 WALDVOGEL Team 3NT S 2D +2 660 1 -1

37 BROWN Team 29 YULE Team 1NT S 3D +4 210 -10 10

9 WARE Team 20 KER Team 3NT S 4D +2 660 1 -1

32 DJOROVIC Team 27 TUMILOWICZ Team 3NT S 4D +2 660 0 0

30 LIVINGSTON Team 24 SIMPSON Team 4 S 4D = 620 -1 1

38 MOSLEY Team 35 GIBBONS Team 3NT S 4D +1 630 -1 1

24 SIMPSON Team 30 LIVINGSTON Team 3NT S 4D +2 660 1 -1

23 MCKIRDY Team 34 WESTOBY Team 1NT S 4D +4 210 0 0

11 HALL Team 3 FOIDL Team 4 S 4S = 620 0 0

41 DAVIES Team 28 HURLEY Team 4 S 4S -1 100 -7 7

20 KER Team 9 WARE Team 4 S 4S = 620 -1 1

28 HURLEY Team 41 DAVIES Team 1NT S 5D +4 210 7 -7

2 JOHNSTONE Team 40 WOODHALL Team 4 S 5S -1 100 -7 7

31 HAYWOOD Team 44 BARON Team 4 S 5S = 620 -1 1

15 OYSTON Team 5 SUN Team 4 S 5S -2 200 -13 13

21 CARTNER Team 1 WALKER Team 1NT S 6D +5 240 2 -2

43 WATSON Team 12 SOMERVILLE Team 1NT S 6D +4 210 -10 10

40 WOODHALL Team 2 JOHNSTONE Team 1NT S 6D +4 210 7 -7

6 CARSON Team 42 GRANT Team 3NT S 6D +2 660 1 -1

10 DEAN Team 17 DONBAVAND Team 3NT S 6D +3 690 1 -1

35 GIBBONS Team 38 MOSLEY Team 3NT S 6D +2 660 1 -1

34 WESTOBY Team 23 MCKIRDY Team 1NT S 6D +4 210 0 0

29 YULE Team 37 BROWN Team 3NT S 6D +2 660 10 -10

18 BOOKER Team 19 CAMP Team 1NT S 6D +4 210 0 0

19 CAMP Team 18 BOOKER Team 2NT S 6D +3 210 0 0

12 SOMERVILLE Team 43 WATSON Team 3NT S 9S +2 660 10 -10

17 DONBAVAND Team 10 DEAN Team 4 S AD +1 650 -1 1

27 TUMILOWICZ Team 32 DJOROVIC Team 4 S AD +1 650 0 0

4 INGLIS Team 26 BLACKBURN Team 4 S AD = 620 9 -9

44 BARON Team 31 HAYWOOD Team 4 S AD +1 650 1 -1

22 D'ARCY Team 16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 1NT E KH -3 150 -1 1

14 LACEY Team 7 BADLEY Team 4 S TH = 620 10 -10

13 EDGINTON Team 33 DRISCOLL Team 4 S TH -1 100 -7 7

7 BADLEY Team 14 LACEY Team 2 S TH +2 170 -10 10

5 SUN Team 15 OYSTON Team 4 S TH = 620 13 -13

16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 22 D'ARCY Team 2 S TS +2 170 1 -1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by NS +3 690 1
3NT by NS +2 660 8
4 by NS +1 650 3
3NT by NS +1 630 1
4 by NS = 620 11
1NT by NS +5 240 1
2NT by NS +3 210 1
1NT by NS +4 210 7
2 by NS +3 200 1
2 by NS +2 170 4
2 by NS +2 170 1
1NT by EW -3 150 1
4 by NS -1 -100 3
4 by NS -2 -200 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 WALKER Team	21 CARTNER Team	2 S	2C	+2	170		-2	2
3 FOIDL Team	11 HALL Team	4 S	2C	=	620		0	0
42 GRANT Team	6 CARSON Team	4 S	2C	=	620		-1	1
25 BURROWS Team	39 TIPPETT Team	4 S	2C	=	620		10	-10
39 TIPPETT Team	25 BURROWS Team	2 S	2C	+2	170		-10	10
26 BLACKBURN Team	4 INGLIS Team	2 S	2C	+3	200		-9	9
8 WALDVOGEL Team	36 WYLIE Team	4 S	2C	=	620		-1	1
33 DRISCOLL Team	13 EDGINTON Team	2 N	2C	+2	170		7	-7
36 WYLIE Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	3NT S	2D	+2	660		1	-1
37 BROWN Team	29 YULE Team	1NT S	3D	+4	210		-10	10
9 WARE Team	20 KER Team	3NT S	4D	+2	660		1	-1
32 DJOROVIC Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	3NT S	4D	+2	660		0	0
30 LIVINGSTON Team	24 SIMPSON Team	4 S	4D	=	620		-1	1
38 MOSLEY Team	35 GIBBONS Team	3NT S	4D	+1	630		-1	1
24 SIMPSON Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	3NT S	4D	+2	660		1	-1
23 MCKIRDY Team	34 WESTOBY Team	1NT S	4D	+4	210		0	0
11 HALL Team	3 FOIDL Team	4 S	4S	=	620		0	0
41 DAVIES Team	28 HURLEY Team	4 S	4S	-1		100	-7	7
20 KER Team	9 WARE Team	4 S	4S	=	620		-1	1
28 HURLEY Team	41 DAVIES Team	1NT S	5D	+4	210		7	-7
2 JOHNSTONE Team	40 WOODHALL Team	4 S	5S	-1		100	-7	7
31 HAYWOOD Team	44 BARON Team	4 S	5S	=	620		-1	1
15 OYSTON Team	5 SUN Team	4 S	5S	-2		200	-13	13
21 CARTNER Team	1 WALKER Team	1NT S	6D	+5	240		2	-2
43 WATSON Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	1NT S	6D	+4	210		-10	10
40 WOODHALL Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	1NT S	6D	+4	210		7	-7
6 CARSON Team	42 GRANT Team	3NT S	6D	+2	660		1	-1
10 DEAN Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	3NT S	6D	+3	690		1	-1
35 GIBBONS Team	38 MOSLEY Team	3NT S	6D	+2	660		1	-1
34 WESTOBY Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	1NT S	6D	+4	210		0	0
29 YULE Team	37 BROWN Team	3NT S	6D	+2	660		10	-10
18 BOOKER Team	19 CAMP Team	1NT S	6D	+4	210		0	0
19 CAMP Team	18 BOOKER Team	2NT S	6D	+3	210		0	0
12 SOMERVILLE Team	43 WATSON Team	3NT S	9S	+2	660		10	-10
17 DONBAVAND Team	10 DEAN Team	4 S	AD	+1	650		-1	1
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	4 S	AD	+1	650		0	0
4 INGLIS Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	4 S	AD	=	620		9	-9
44 BARON Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	4 S	AD	+1	650		1	-1
22 D'ARCY Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	1NT E	KH	-3	150		-1	1
14 LACEY Team	7 BADLEY Team	4 S	TH	=	620		10	-10
13 EDGINTON Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	4 S	TH	-1		100	-7	7
7 BADLEY Team	14 LACEY Team	2 S	TH	+2	170		-10	10
5 SUN Team	15 OYSTON Team	4 S	TH	=	620		13	-13
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	22 D'ARCY Team	2 S	TS	+2	170		1	-1

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+3	690	1
3NT by NS	+2	660	8
4 by NS	+1	650	3
3NT by NS	+1	630	1
4 by NS	=	620	11
1NT by NS	+5	240	1
2NT by NS	+3	210	1
1NT by NS	+4	210	7
2 by NS	+3	200	1
2 by NS	+2	170	4
2 by NS	+2	170	1
1NT by EW	-3	150	1
4 by NS	-1	-100	3
4 by NS	-2	-200	1