Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 6

Board No: 28
Dealer: W, Vul: NS, Room Datum: 90

Go to Previous Board          Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Yule Team 20 Luoni Team 1NT N 4S +3 180 1 -1

2 Turner Team 19 Young Team 4 N JD -1 100 -7 7

3 Buzzard Team 16 Monaghan Team 2 N JD +1 140 0 0

4 Pemberton Team 24 Gordon Team 4 W 4H -2 100 5 -5

5 van Wijngaarden Team 26 Watson Team 2 S TS = 110 -2 2

6 Malthus Team 8 Robinson Team 4 S 2D -1 100 -12 12

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 18 Abraham Team 4 N JD -2 200 -3 3

8 Robinson Team 6 Malthus Team 4 S KD = 620 12 -12

9 Miao Team 25 Richardson Team 3 W AS -1 50 4 -4

10 Tislevoll Team 22 Foidl Team 2 S QD +1 140 0 0

11 Johnstone Team 21 Davies Team 2 S KD +1 140 0 0

12 Grant Team 23 Roggeveen Team 3 S 5H = 140 0 0

13 Bartoli Team 17 Bott Team 3 S KD -1 100 -6 6

14 Dowling Team 27 Gray Team 2 S 6S = 110 0 0

15 Curnow Team 28 Lovell Team 2 S KD +2 170 -10 10

16 Monaghan Team 3 Buzzard Team 2 S KD +1 140 0 0

17 Bott Team 13 Bartoli Team 2 S KD +1 140 6 -6

18 Abraham Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 N JD -1 100 3 -3

19 Young Team 2 Turner Team 2 S KD +2 170 7 -7

20 Luoni Team 1 Yule Team 2 S KD +1 140 -1 1

21 Davies Team 11 Johnstone Team 2 S KD +1 140 0 0

22 Foidl Team 10 Tislevoll Team 2 S KD +1 140 0 0

23 Roggeveen Team 12 Grant Team 3 S KD = 140 0 0

24 Gordon Team 4 Pemberton Team 3 S KD -1 100 -5 5

25 Richardson Team 9 Miao Team 4 S QD -1 100 -4 4

26 Watson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 3 S KD +1 170 2 -2

27 Gray Team 14 Dowling Team 2 S KD = 110 0 0

28 Lovell Team 15 Curnow Team 4 S KD = 620 10 -10

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board          Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by NS = 620 2
1NT by NS +3 180 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
2 by NS +2 170 2
3 by NS = 140 2
2 by NS +1 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 7
2 by NS = 110 3
4 by EW -2 100 1
3 by EW -1 50 1
4 by NS -1 -100 1
4 by NS -1 -100 2
3 by NS -1 -100 2
3 by NS -1 -100 1
4 by NS -2 -200 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Yule Team	20 Luoni Team	1NT N	4S	+3	180		1	-1
2 Turner Team	19 Young Team	4 N	JD	-1		100	-7	7
3 Buzzard Team	16 Monaghan Team	2 N	JD	+1	140		0	0
4 Pemberton Team	24 Gordon Team	4 W	4H	-2	100		5	-5
5 van Wijngaarden Team	26 Watson Team	2 S	TS	=	110		-2	2
6 Malthus Team	8 Robinson Team	4 S	2D	-1		100	-12	12
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	18 Abraham Team	4 N	JD	-2		200	-3	3
8 Robinson Team	6 Malthus Team	4 S	KD	=	620		12	-12
9 Miao Team	25 Richardson Team	3 W	AS	-1	50		4	-4
10 Tislevoll Team	22 Foidl Team	2 S	QD	+1	140		0	0
11 Johnstone Team	21 Davies Team	2 S	KD	+1	140		0	0
12 Grant Team	23 Roggeveen Team	3 S	5H	=	140		0	0
13 Bartoli Team	17 Bott Team	3 S	KD	-1		100	-6	6
14 Dowling Team	27 Gray Team	2 S	6S	=	110		0	0
15 Curnow Team	28 Lovell Team	2 S	KD	+2	170		-10	10
16 Monaghan Team	3 Buzzard Team	2 S	KD	+1	140		0	0
17 Bott Team	13 Bartoli Team	2 S	KD	+1	140		6	-6
18 Abraham Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 N	JD	-1		100	3	-3
19 Young Team	2 Turner Team	2 S	KD	+2	170		7	-7
20 Luoni Team	1 Yule Team	2 S	KD	+1	140		-1	1
21 Davies Team	11 Johnstone Team	2 S	KD	+1	140		0	0
22 Foidl Team	10 Tislevoll Team	2 S	KD	+1	140		0	0
23 Roggeveen Team	12 Grant Team	3 S	KD	=	140		0	0
24 Gordon Team	4 Pemberton Team	3 S	KD	-1		100	-5	5
25 Richardson Team	9 Miao Team	4 S	QD	-1		100	-4	4
26 Watson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	3 S	KD	+1	170		2	-2
27 Gray Team	14 Dowling Team	2 S	KD	=	110		0	0
28 Lovell Team	15 Curnow Team	4 S	KD	=	620		10	-10

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by NS	=	620	2
1NT by NS	+3	180	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
2 by NS	+2	170	2
3 by NS	=	140	2
2 by NS	+1	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	7
2 by NS	=	110	3
4 by EW	-2	100	1
3 by EW	-1	50	1
4 by NS	-1	-100	1
4 by NS	-1	-100	2
3 by NS	-1	-100	2
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
4 by NS	-2	-200	1