Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 27
Dealer: S, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: 290

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 3 S JD -1 50 -11 11

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 3NT N KD +2 460 1 -1

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 1NT N KD +4 210 3 -3

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 3 S JD = 140 -2 2

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 2NT N KD +2 180 -6 6

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 4 S JD -1 50 -6 6

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 3NT N KD = 400 6 -6

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 2 S 8D +1 140 -8 8

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 3NT N KD +2 460 7 -7

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 3NT N KD +2 460 11 -11

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 1NT N KD +4 210 -6 6

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 3 S JD +1 170 -7 7

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 1NT N KD = 90 -3 3

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 3NT N KD = 400 3 -3

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 3NT N KD +1 430 -1 1

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 3NT N KD +2 460 7 -7

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 3NT N KD +2 460 1 -1

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 2X E QH -2 300 -3 3

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 3NT N KD +2 460 6 -6

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 4 N KD -1 50 -11 11

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 3 N KD +1 170 -7 7

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 3NT N KD +2 460 11 -11

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 2 S JD +1 140 -6 6

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 2 S JD +2 170 6 -6

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 4 N KD = 420 6 -6

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 2X W QC -3 500 8 -8

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 4 N KD = 420 -1 1

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 1NT N 5D +4 210 2 -2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 27
Contract Result Score Frequency
2X by EW -3 500 1
3NT by NS +2 460 7
3NT by NS +1 430 1
4 by NS = 420 2
3NT by NS = 400 2
2X by EW -2 300 1
1NT by NS +4 210 3
2NT by NS +2 180 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
2 by NS +2 170 1
3 by NS = 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 2
1NT by NS = 90 1
4 by NS -1 -50 1
4 by NS -1 -50 1
3 by NS -1 -50 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	3 S	JD	-1		50	-11	11
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	3NT N	KD	+2	460		1	-1
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	1NT N	KD	+4	210		3	-3
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	3 S	JD	=	140		-2	2
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	2NT N	KD	+2	180		-6	6
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	4 S	JD	-1		50	-6	6
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	3NT N	KD	=	400		6	-6
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	2 S	8D	+1	140		-8	8
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	3NT N	KD	+2	460		7	-7
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	3NT N	KD	+2	460		11	-11
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	1NT N	KD	+4	210		-6	6
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	3 S	JD	+1	170		-7	7
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	1NT N	KD	=	90		-3	3
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	3NT N	KD	=	400		3	-3
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	3NT N	KD	+1	430		-1	1
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	3NT N	KD	+2	460		7	-7
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	3NT N	KD	+2	460		1	-1
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	2X E	QH	-2	300		-3	3
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	3NT N	KD	+2	460		6	-6
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	4 N	KD	-1		50	-11	11
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	3 N	KD	+1	170		-7	7
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	3NT N	KD	+2	460		11	-11
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	2 S	JD	+1	140		-6	6
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	2 S	JD	+2	170		6	-6
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	4 N	KD	=	420		6	-6
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	2X W	QC	-3	500		8	-8
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	4 N	KD	=	420		-1	1
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	1NT N	5D	+4	210		2	-2

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 27
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2X by EW	-3	500	1
3NT by NS	+2	460	7
3NT by NS	+1	430	1
4 by NS	=	420	2
3NT by NS	=	400	2
2X by EW	-2	300	1
1NT by NS	+4	210	3
2NT by NS	+2	180	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
2 by NS	+2	170	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	2
1NT by NS	=	90	1
4 by NS	-1	-50	1
4 by NS	-1	-50	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1