Boards Results

NORTH ISLAND TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -560

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

25 BURROWS Team 39 TIPPETT Team 3 W 6D +3 170 15 -15

43 WATSON Team 12 SOMERVILLE Team 5 E 2S +2 640 -1 1

6 CARSON Team 42 GRANT Team 3NT E AH +2 660 -2 2

17 DONBAVAND Team 10 DEAN Team 4 W QH +2 680 -2 2

11 HALL Team 3 FOIDL Team 4 W QH +1 650 -2 2

20 KER Team 9 WARE Team 5 E AH +1 620 -12 12

19 CAMP Team 18 BOOKER Team 4 E AH +1 150 10 -10

34 WESTOBY Team 23 MCKIRDY Team 3NT E 8D +1 630 -1 1

16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 22 D'ARCY Team 5 E AH +1 620 -1 1

33 DRISCOLL Team 13 EDGINTON Team 5 E 7C +1 620 0 0

13 EDGINTON Team 33 DRISCOLL Team 5 E AH +1 620 0 0

24 SIMPSON Team 30 LIVINGSTON Team 4 E 7C +1 650 -1 1

30 LIVINGSTON Team 24 SIMPSON Team 5 E 4D +1 620 1 -1

41 DAVIES Team 28 HURLEY Team 4 W QH +1 650 -2 2

27 TUMILOWICZ Team 32 DJOROVIC Team 5 E AH +1 620 -1 1

5 SUN Team 15 OYSTON Team 4 W KD +1 650 -2 2

4 INGLIS Team 26 BLACKBURN Team 5 E AH +1 620 -1 1

29 YULE Team 37 BROWN Team 4 E 6D +1 650 -2 2

36 WYLIE Team 8 WALDVOGEL Team 3NT E 6H = 600 -14 14

32 DJOROVIC Team 27 TUMILOWICZ Team 3NT E 8H = 600 1 -1

35 GIBBONS Team 38 MOSLEY Team 3NT E 6H = 600 0 0

23 MCKIRDY Team 34 WESTOBY Team 3NT E 6H = 600 1 -1

37 BROWN Team 29 YULE Team 3NT E 3H = 600 2 -2

38 MOSLEY Team 35 GIBBONS Team 5 E 8D = 600 0 0

39 TIPPETT Team 25 BURROWS Team 6 E 5C = 1370 -15 15

40 WOODHALL Team 2 JOHNSTONE Team 6 E AH = 1370 -13 13

42 GRANT Team 6 CARSON Team 3NT E 6H = 600 2 -2

44 BARON Team 31 HAYWOOD Team 5 E 4D = 600 -12 12

28 HURLEY Team 41 DAVIES Team 3NT E 6H = 600 2 -2

26 BLACKBURN Team 4 INGLIS Team 3NT E 6H = 600 1 -1

1 WALKER Team 21 CARTNER Team 3NT E 7S = 600 0 0

22 D'ARCY Team 16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 3NT E 8H = 600 1 -1

21 CARTNER Team 1 WALKER Team 5 E AH = 600 0 0

18 BOOKER Team 19 CAMP Team 3NT E 6H = 600 -10 10

15 OYSTON Team 5 SUN Team 3NT E 6H = 600 2 -2

14 LACEY Team 7 BADLEY Team 3NT E 6H = 600 -13 13

12 SOMERVILLE Team 43 WATSON Team 5 E 5C = 600 1 -1

10 DEAN Team 17 DONBAVAND Team 3NT E 6H = 600 2 -2

3 FOIDL Team 11 HALL Team 3NT E 6H = 600 2 -2

2 JOHNSTONE Team 40 WOODHALL Team 3NT E 6H = 600 13 -13

31 HAYWOOD Team 44 BARON Team 4 W QH -1 100 12 -12

9 WARE Team 20 KER Team 6 E 6D -1 100 12 -12

7 BADLEY Team 14 LACEY Team 3NT W QH -2 200 13 -13

8 WALDVOGEL Team 36 WYLIE Team 6 W QH -3 300 14 -14

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
6 by EW -3 300 1
3NT by EW -2 200 1
6 by EW -1 100 1
4 by EW -1 100 1
4 by EW +1 -150 1
3 by EW +3 -170 1
3NT by EW = -600 16
5 by EW = -600 4
5 by EW +1 -620 7
3NT by EW +1 -630 1
5 by EW +2 -640 1
4 by EW +1 -650 3
4 by EW +1 -650 2
3NT by EW +2 -660 1
4 by EW +2 -680 1
6 by EW = -1370 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
25 BURROWS Team	39 TIPPETT Team	3 W	6D	+3		170	15	-15
43 WATSON Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	5 E	2S	+2		640	-1	1
6 CARSON Team	42 GRANT Team	3NT E	AH	+2		660	-2	2
17 DONBAVAND Team	10 DEAN Team	4 W	QH	+2		680	-2	2
11 HALL Team	3 FOIDL Team	4 W	QH	+1		650	-2	2
20 KER Team	9 WARE Team	5 E	AH	+1		620	-12	12
19 CAMP Team	18 BOOKER Team	4 E	AH	+1		150	10	-10
34 WESTOBY Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	3NT E	8D	+1		630	-1	1
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	22 D'ARCY Team	5 E	AH	+1		620	-1	1
33 DRISCOLL Team	13 EDGINTON Team	5 E	7C	+1		620	0	0
13 EDGINTON Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	5 E	AH	+1		620	0	0
24 SIMPSON Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	4 E	7C	+1		650	-1	1
30 LIVINGSTON Team	24 SIMPSON Team	5 E	4D	+1		620	1	-1
41 DAVIES Team	28 HURLEY Team	4 W	QH	+1		650	-2	2
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	5 E	AH	+1		620	-1	1
5 SUN Team	15 OYSTON Team	4 W	KD	+1		650	-2	2
4 INGLIS Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	5 E	AH	+1		620	-1	1
29 YULE Team	37 BROWN Team	4 E	6D	+1		650	-2	2
36 WYLIE Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	-14	14
32 DJOROVIC Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	3NT E	8H	=		600	1	-1
35 GIBBONS Team	38 MOSLEY Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	0	0
23 MCKIRDY Team	34 WESTOBY Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	1	-1
37 BROWN Team	29 YULE Team	3NT E	3H	=		600	2	-2
38 MOSLEY Team	35 GIBBONS Team	5 E	8D	=		600	0	0
39 TIPPETT Team	25 BURROWS Team	6 E	5C	=		1370	-15	15
40 WOODHALL Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	6 E	AH	=		1370	-13	13
42 GRANT Team	6 CARSON Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	2	-2
44 BARON Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	5 E	4D	=		600	-12	12
28 HURLEY Team	41 DAVIES Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	2	-2
26 BLACKBURN Team	4 INGLIS Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	1	-1
1 WALKER Team	21 CARTNER Team	3NT E	7S	=		600	0	0
22 D'ARCY Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	3NT E	8H	=		600	1	-1
21 CARTNER Team	1 WALKER Team	5 E	AH	=		600	0	0
18 BOOKER Team	19 CAMP Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	-10	10
15 OYSTON Team	5 SUN Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	2	-2
14 LACEY Team	7 BADLEY Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	-13	13
12 SOMERVILLE Team	43 WATSON Team	5 E	5C	=		600	1	-1
10 DEAN Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	2	-2
3 FOIDL Team	11 HALL Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	2	-2
2 JOHNSTONE Team	40 WOODHALL Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	13	-13
31 HAYWOOD Team	44 BARON Team	4 W	QH	-1	100		12	-12
9 WARE Team	20 KER Team	6 E	6D	-1	100		12	-12
7 BADLEY Team	14 LACEY Team	3NT W	QH	-2	200		13	-13
8 WALDVOGEL Team	36 WYLIE Team	6 W	QH	-3	300		14	-14

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
6 by EW	-3	300	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
6 by EW	-1	100	1
4 by EW	-1	100	1
4 by EW	+1	-150	1
3 by EW	+3	-170	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	16
5 by EW	=	-600	4
5 by EW	+1	-620	7
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
5 by EW	+2	-640	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	3
4 by EW	+1	-650	2
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1
4 by EW	+2	-680	1
6 by EW	=	-1370	2