Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -580

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

5 van Wijngaarden Team 18 Abraham Team 4 E 2S +1 650 -13 13

14 Dowling Team 15 Curnow Team 4X N AH -2 500 -12 12

12 Grant Team 1 Yule Team 4 E TC +1 650 -10 10

28 Lovell Team 2 Turner Team 4X E 9S +1 990 -9 9

4 Pemberton Team 23 Roggeveen Team 4 W QS = 620 -9 9

24 Gordon Team 8 Robinson Team 4 E 9S +1 650 -8 8

9 Miao Team 17 Bott Team 4 W QS +1 650 -4 4

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 Buzzard Team 4 E QS +1 650 -1 1

10 Tislevoll Team 25 Richardson Team 4 E QS +1 650 -1 1

19 Young Team 21 Davies Team 4 W QS +1 650 -1 1

26 Watson Team 6 Malthus Team 4 W QS +1 650 -1 1

27 Gray Team 20 Luoni Team 4 E 9S +1 650 0 0

22 Foidl Team 13 Bartoli Team 4 W QS +1 650 0 0

20 Luoni Team 27 Gray Team 4 E 6S +1 650 0 0

16 Monaghan Team 11 Johnstone Team 4 W QS = 620 0 0

13 Bartoli Team 22 Foidl Team 4 W 6S +1 650 0 0

11 Johnstone Team 16 Monaghan Team 4 E 8S = 620 0 0

3 Buzzard Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 4 E TC = 620 1 -1

6 Malthus Team 26 Watson Team 4 E TC = 620 1 -1

21 Davies Team 19 Young Team 4 E QD = 620 1 -1

25 Richardson Team 10 Tislevoll Team 4 W QS = 620 1 -1

17 Bott Team 9 Miao Team 4X N AH -2 500 4 -4

8 Robinson Team 24 Gordon Team 3 N 4C -3 300 8 -8

2 Turner Team 28 Lovell Team 4 E QD = 620 9 -9

23 Roggeveen Team 4 Pemberton Team 4X N AH -1 200 9 -9

1 Yule Team 12 Grant Team 4X N AH -1 200 10 -10

15 Curnow Team 14 Dowling Team 4 E TC -1 100 12 -12

18 Abraham Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 4 E TC -1 100 13 -13

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -1 100 2
4X by NS -1 -200 2
3 by NS -3 -300 1
4X by NS -2 -500 2
4 by EW = -620 5
4 by EW = -620 3
4 by EW +1 -650 7
4 by EW +1 -650 5
4X by EW +1 -990 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
5 van Wijngaarden Team	18 Abraham Team	4 E	2S	+1		650	-13	13
14 Dowling Team	15 Curnow Team	4X N	AH	-2		500	-12	12
12 Grant Team	1 Yule Team	4 E	TC	+1		650	-10	10
28 Lovell Team	2 Turner Team	4X E	9S	+1		990	-9	9
4 Pemberton Team	23 Roggeveen Team	4 W	QS	=		620	-9	9
24 Gordon Team	8 Robinson Team	4 E	9S	+1		650	-8	8
9 Miao Team	17 Bott Team	4 W	QS	+1		650	-4	4
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 Buzzard Team	4 E	QS	+1		650	-1	1
10 Tislevoll Team	25 Richardson Team	4 E	QS	+1		650	-1	1
19 Young Team	21 Davies Team	4 W	QS	+1		650	-1	1
26 Watson Team	6 Malthus Team	4 W	QS	+1		650	-1	1
27 Gray Team	20 Luoni Team	4 E	9S	+1		650	0	0
22 Foidl Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 W	QS	+1		650	0	0
20 Luoni Team	27 Gray Team	4 E	6S	+1		650	0	0
16 Monaghan Team	11 Johnstone Team	4 W	QS	=		620	0	0
13 Bartoli Team	22 Foidl Team	4 W	6S	+1		650	0	0
11 Johnstone Team	16 Monaghan Team	4 E	8S	=		620	0	0
3 Buzzard Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 E	TC	=		620	1	-1
6 Malthus Team	26 Watson Team	4 E	TC	=		620	1	-1
21 Davies Team	19 Young Team	4 E	QD	=		620	1	-1
25 Richardson Team	10 Tislevoll Team	4 W	QS	=		620	1	-1
17 Bott Team	9 Miao Team	4X N	AH	-2		500	4	-4
8 Robinson Team	24 Gordon Team	3 N	4C	-3		300	8	-8
2 Turner Team	28 Lovell Team	4 E	QD	=		620	9	-9
23 Roggeveen Team	4 Pemberton Team	4X N	AH	-1		200	9	-9
1 Yule Team	12 Grant Team	4X N	AH	-1		200	10	-10
15 Curnow Team	14 Dowling Team	4 E	TC	-1	100		12	-12
18 Abraham Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	4 E	TC	-1	100		13	-13

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-1	100	2
4X by NS	-1	-200	2
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
4X by NS	-2	-500	2
4 by EW	=	-620	5
4 by EW	=	-620	3
4 by EW	+1	-650	7
4 by EW	+1	-650	5
4X by EW	+1	-990	1