Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 6

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -120

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Yule Team 20 Luoni Team 1NT E 2H +1 120 0 0

2 Turner Team 19 Young Team 1NT W 5S +1 120 -1 1

3 Buzzard Team 16 Monaghan Team 2NT E 9D = 120 -1 1

4 Pemberton Team 24 Gordon Team 1NT E 2H = 90 2 -2

5 van Wijngaarden Team 26 Watson Team 1NT W 5S +2 150 0 0

6 Malthus Team 8 Robinson Team 1NT W 5S +2 150 -1 1

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 18 Abraham Team 1NT E 5S +1 120 0 0

8 Robinson Team 6 Malthus Team 1NT E 4S +1 120 1 -1

9 Miao Team 25 Richardson Team 1NT E AC +1 120 0 0

10 Tislevoll Team 22 Foidl Team 1NT E TD = 90 1 -1

11 Johnstone Team 21 Davies Team 1NT E 2H +1 120 0 0

12 Grant Team 23 Roggeveen Team 1NT W 6S +1 120 0 0

13 Bartoli Team 17 Bott Team 1NT W 5H -1 100 -3 3

14 Dowling Team 27 Gray Team 1NT E 2H +1 120 0 0

15 Curnow Team 28 Lovell Team 1NT E 2H +1 120 0 0

16 Monaghan Team 3 Buzzard Team 1NT E 2H = 90 1 -1

17 Bott Team 13 Bartoli Team 1NT E TD -2 200 3 -3

18 Abraham Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 1NT E 2H +1 120 0 0

19 Young Team 2 Turner Team 1NT E 2H = 90 1 -1

20 Luoni Team 1 Yule Team 1NT E 6H +1 120 0 0

21 Davies Team 11 Johnstone Team 1NT E 2H +1 120 0 0

22 Foidl Team 10 Tislevoll Team 1NT E 2H +1 120 -1 1

23 Roggeveen Team 12 Grant Team 1NT E 6H +1 120 0 0

24 Gordon Team 4 Pemberton Team 1NT W 7C +2 150 -2 2

25 Richardson Team 9 Miao Team 1NT E 6H +1 120 0 0

26 Watson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 1NT W 5S +2 150 0 0

27 Gray Team 14 Dowling Team 2NT W 3S = 120 0 0

28 Lovell Team 15 Curnow Team 1NT E 2H +1 120 0 0

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
1NT by EW -2 200 1
1NT by EW -1 100 1
1NT by EW = -90 4
2NT by EW = -120 1
2NT by EW = -120 1
1NT by EW +1 -120 14
1NT by EW +1 -120 2
1NT by EW +2 -150 4

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Yule Team	20 Luoni Team	1NT E	2H	+1		120	0	0
2 Turner Team	19 Young Team	1NT W	5S	+1		120	-1	1
3 Buzzard Team	16 Monaghan Team	2NT E	9D	=		120	-1	1
4 Pemberton Team	24 Gordon Team	1NT E	2H	=		90	2	-2
5 van Wijngaarden Team	26 Watson Team	1NT W	5S	+2		150	0	0
6 Malthus Team	8 Robinson Team	1NT W	5S	+2		150	-1	1
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	18 Abraham Team	1NT E	5S	+1		120	0	0
8 Robinson Team	6 Malthus Team	1NT E	4S	+1		120	1	-1
9 Miao Team	25 Richardson Team	1NT E	AC	+1		120	0	0
10 Tislevoll Team	22 Foidl Team	1NT E	TD	=		90	1	-1
11 Johnstone Team	21 Davies Team	1NT E	2H	+1		120	0	0
12 Grant Team	23 Roggeveen Team	1NT W	6S	+1		120	0	0
13 Bartoli Team	17 Bott Team	1NT W	5H	-1	100		-3	3
14 Dowling Team	27 Gray Team	1NT E	2H	+1		120	0	0
15 Curnow Team	28 Lovell Team	1NT E	2H	+1		120	0	0
16 Monaghan Team	3 Buzzard Team	1NT E	2H	=		90	1	-1
17 Bott Team	13 Bartoli Team	1NT E	TD	-2	200		3	-3
18 Abraham Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	1NT E	2H	+1		120	0	0
19 Young Team	2 Turner Team	1NT E	2H	=		90	1	-1
20 Luoni Team	1 Yule Team	1NT E	6H	+1		120	0	0
21 Davies Team	11 Johnstone Team	1NT E	2H	+1		120	0	0
22 Foidl Team	10 Tislevoll Team	1NT E	2H	+1		120	-1	1
23 Roggeveen Team	12 Grant Team	1NT E	6H	+1		120	0	0
24 Gordon Team	4 Pemberton Team	1NT W	7C	+2		150	-2	2
25 Richardson Team	9 Miao Team	1NT E	6H	+1		120	0	0
26 Watson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	1NT W	5S	+2		150	0	0
27 Gray Team	14 Dowling Team	2NT W	3S	=		120	0	0
28 Lovell Team	15 Curnow Team	1NT E	2H	+1		120	0	0

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
1NT by EW	-2	200	1
1NT by EW	-1	100	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	4
2NT by EW	=	-120	1
2NT by EW	=	-120	1
1NT by EW	+1	-120	14
1NT by EW	+1	-120	2
1NT by EW	+2	-150	4