Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -580

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Yule Team 12 Grant Team 4X N AH -1 200 10 -10

2 Turner Team 28 Lovell Team 4 E QD = 620 9 -9

3 Buzzard Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 4 E TC = 620 1 -1

4 Pemberton Team 23 Roggeveen Team 4 W QS = 620 -9 9

5 van Wijngaarden Team 18 Abraham Team 4 E 2S +1 650 -13 13

6 Malthus Team 26 Watson Team 4 E TC = 620 1 -1

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 Buzzard Team 4 E QS +1 650 -1 1

8 Robinson Team 24 Gordon Team 3 N 4C -3 300 8 -8

9 Miao Team 17 Bott Team 4 W QS +1 650 -4 4

10 Tislevoll Team 25 Richardson Team 4 E QS +1 650 -1 1

11 Johnstone Team 16 Monaghan Team 4 E 8S = 620 0 0

12 Grant Team 1 Yule Team 4 E TC +1 650 -10 10

13 Bartoli Team 22 Foidl Team 4 W 6S +1 650 0 0

14 Dowling Team 15 Curnow Team 4X N AH -2 500 -12 12

15 Curnow Team 14 Dowling Team 4 E TC -1 100 12 -12

16 Monaghan Team 11 Johnstone Team 4 W QS = 620 0 0

17 Bott Team 9 Miao Team 4X N AH -2 500 4 -4

18 Abraham Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 4 E TC -1 100 13 -13

19 Young Team 21 Davies Team 4 W QS +1 650 -1 1

20 Luoni Team 27 Gray Team 4 E 6S +1 650 0 0

21 Davies Team 19 Young Team 4 E QD = 620 1 -1

22 Foidl Team 13 Bartoli Team 4 W QS +1 650 0 0

23 Roggeveen Team 4 Pemberton Team 4X N AH -1 200 9 -9

24 Gordon Team 8 Robinson Team 4 E 9S +1 650 -8 8

25 Richardson Team 10 Tislevoll Team 4 W QS = 620 1 -1

26 Watson Team 6 Malthus Team 4 W QS +1 650 -1 1

27 Gray Team 20 Luoni Team 4 E 9S +1 650 0 0

28 Lovell Team 2 Turner Team 4X E 9S +1 990 -9 9

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -1 100 2
4X by NS -1 -200 2
3 by NS -3 -300 1
4X by NS -2 -500 2
4 by EW = -620 5
4 by EW = -620 3
4 by EW +1 -650 7
4 by EW +1 -650 5
4X by EW +1 -990 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Yule Team	12 Grant Team	4X N	AH	-1		200	10	-10
2 Turner Team	28 Lovell Team	4 E	QD	=		620	9	-9
3 Buzzard Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 E	TC	=		620	1	-1
4 Pemberton Team	23 Roggeveen Team	4 W	QS	=		620	-9	9
5 van Wijngaarden Team	18 Abraham Team	4 E	2S	+1		650	-13	13
6 Malthus Team	26 Watson Team	4 E	TC	=		620	1	-1
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 Buzzard Team	4 E	QS	+1		650	-1	1
8 Robinson Team	24 Gordon Team	3 N	4C	-3		300	8	-8
9 Miao Team	17 Bott Team	4 W	QS	+1		650	-4	4
10 Tislevoll Team	25 Richardson Team	4 E	QS	+1		650	-1	1
11 Johnstone Team	16 Monaghan Team	4 E	8S	=		620	0	0
12 Grant Team	1 Yule Team	4 E	TC	+1		650	-10	10
13 Bartoli Team	22 Foidl Team	4 W	6S	+1		650	0	0
14 Dowling Team	15 Curnow Team	4X N	AH	-2		500	-12	12
15 Curnow Team	14 Dowling Team	4 E	TC	-1	100		12	-12
16 Monaghan Team	11 Johnstone Team	4 W	QS	=		620	0	0
17 Bott Team	9 Miao Team	4X N	AH	-2		500	4	-4
18 Abraham Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	4 E	TC	-1	100		13	-13
19 Young Team	21 Davies Team	4 W	QS	+1		650	-1	1
20 Luoni Team	27 Gray Team	4 E	6S	+1		650	0	0
21 Davies Team	19 Young Team	4 E	QD	=		620	1	-1
22 Foidl Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 W	QS	+1		650	0	0
23 Roggeveen Team	4 Pemberton Team	4X N	AH	-1		200	9	-9
24 Gordon Team	8 Robinson Team	4 E	9S	+1		650	-8	8
25 Richardson Team	10 Tislevoll Team	4 W	QS	=		620	1	-1
26 Watson Team	6 Malthus Team	4 W	QS	+1		650	-1	1
27 Gray Team	20 Luoni Team	4 E	9S	+1		650	0	0
28 Lovell Team	2 Turner Team	4X E	9S	+1		990	-9	9

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-1	100	2
4X by NS	-1	-200	2
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
4X by NS	-2	-500	2
4 by EW	=	-620	5
4 by EW	=	-620	3
4 by EW	+1	-650	7
4 by EW	+1	-650	5
4X by EW	+1	-990	1