Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 25
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 330

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

23 Roggeveen Team 4 Pemberton Team 3NT S 3H -3 150 -12 12

3 Buzzard Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 4 N 3H = 420 0 0

25 Richardson Team 10 Tislevoll Team 3NT S 3H +2 460 7 -7

26 Watson Team 6 Malthus Team 3NT S 3H = 400 6 -6

1 Yule Team 12 Grant Team 3 N 6D +3 230 -5 5

18 Abraham Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 2 N 6H +4 230 -6 6

12 Grant Team 1 Yule Team 3NT S 7C +1 430 5 -5

24 Gordon Team 8 Robinson Team 2 N 8S +4 230 -6 6

13 Bartoli Team 22 Foidl Team 2 S 9H +2 170 -6 6

20 Luoni Team 27 Gray Team 4 N 9H +1 450 1 -1

27 Gray Team 20 Luoni Team 4 N AC = 420 -1 1

5 van Wijngaarden Team 18 Abraham Team 4 N AC +1 450 6 -6

8 Robinson Team 24 Gordon Team 4 N AC +1 450 6 -6

9 Miao Team 17 Bott Team 4 N AC = 420 7 -7

10 Tislevoll Team 25 Richardson Team 3 N AC +1 170 -7 7

4 Pemberton Team 23 Roggeveen Team 4 N AC +1 450 12 -12

15 Curnow Team 14 Dowling Team 4 N AC +1 450 1 -1

17 Bott Team 9 Miao Team 2 N AC +1 110 -7 7

21 Davies Team 19 Young Team 4 N AC = 420 -1 1

28 Lovell Team 2 Turner Team 2 N TH +3 200 1 -1

22 Foidl Team 13 Bartoli Team 4 N TH = 420 6 -6

19 Young Team 21 Davies Team 4 N TH +1 450 1 -1

16 Monaghan Team 11 Johnstone Team 2 N TH +2 170 -1 1

14 Dowling Team 15 Curnow Team 4 N TH = 420 -1 1

11 Johnstone Team 16 Monaghan Team 3 N TH +2 200 1 -1

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 Buzzard Team 4 N TH = 420 0 0

6 Malthus Team 26 Watson Team 3 N TH = 140 -6 6

2 Turner Team 28 Lovell Team 2 N TH +2 170 -1 1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by NS +2 460 1
4 by NS +1 450 6
3NT by NS +1 430 1
4 by NS = 420 7
3NT by NS = 400 1
3 by NS +3 230 1
2 by NS +4 230 2
3 by NS +2 200 1
2 by NS +3 200 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
2 by NS +2 170 2
2 by NS +2 170 1
3 by NS = 140 1
2 by NS +1 110 1
3NT by NS -3 -150 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
23 Roggeveen Team	4 Pemberton Team	3NT S	3H	-3		150	-12	12
3 Buzzard Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 N	3H	=	420		0	0
25 Richardson Team	10 Tislevoll Team	3NT S	3H	+2	460		7	-7
26 Watson Team	6 Malthus Team	3NT S	3H	=	400		6	-6
1 Yule Team	12 Grant Team	3 N	6D	+3	230		-5	5
18 Abraham Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	2 N	6H	+4	230		-6	6
12 Grant Team	1 Yule Team	3NT S	7C	+1	430		5	-5
24 Gordon Team	8 Robinson Team	2 N	8S	+4	230		-6	6
13 Bartoli Team	22 Foidl Team	2 S	9H	+2	170		-6	6
20 Luoni Team	27 Gray Team	4 N	9H	+1	450		1	-1
27 Gray Team	20 Luoni Team	4 N	AC	=	420		-1	1
5 van Wijngaarden Team	18 Abraham Team	4 N	AC	+1	450		6	-6
8 Robinson Team	24 Gordon Team	4 N	AC	+1	450		6	-6
9 Miao Team	17 Bott Team	4 N	AC	=	420		7	-7
10 Tislevoll Team	25 Richardson Team	3 N	AC	+1	170		-7	7
4 Pemberton Team	23 Roggeveen Team	4 N	AC	+1	450		12	-12
15 Curnow Team	14 Dowling Team	4 N	AC	+1	450		1	-1
17 Bott Team	9 Miao Team	2 N	AC	+1	110		-7	7
21 Davies Team	19 Young Team	4 N	AC	=	420		-1	1
28 Lovell Team	2 Turner Team	2 N	TH	+3	200		1	-1
22 Foidl Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 N	TH	=	420		6	-6
19 Young Team	21 Davies Team	4 N	TH	+1	450		1	-1
16 Monaghan Team	11 Johnstone Team	2 N	TH	+2	170		-1	1
14 Dowling Team	15 Curnow Team	4 N	TH	=	420		-1	1
11 Johnstone Team	16 Monaghan Team	3 N	TH	+2	200		1	-1
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 Buzzard Team	4 N	TH	=	420		0	0
6 Malthus Team	26 Watson Team	3 N	TH	=	140		-6	6
2 Turner Team	28 Lovell Team	2 N	TH	+2	170		-1	1

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+2	460	1
4 by NS	+1	450	6
3NT by NS	+1	430	1
4 by NS	=	420	7
3NT by NS	=	400	1
3 by NS	+3	230	1
2 by NS	+4	230	2
3 by NS	+2	200	1
2 by NS	+3	200	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
2 by NS	+2	170	2
2 by NS	+2	170	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	+1	110	1
3NT by NS	-3	-150	1