Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 25
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 330

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

23 Roggeveen Team 4 Pemberton Team 3NT S 3H -3 150 -12 12

17 Bott Team 9 Miao Team 2 N AC +1 110 -7 7

10 Tislevoll Team 25 Richardson Team 3 N AC +1 170 -7 7

18 Abraham Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 2 N 6H +4 230 -6 6

13 Bartoli Team 22 Foidl Team 2 S 9H +2 170 -6 6

24 Gordon Team 8 Robinson Team 2 N 8S +4 230 -6 6

6 Malthus Team 26 Watson Team 3 N TH = 140 -6 6

1 Yule Team 12 Grant Team 3 N 6D +3 230 -5 5

27 Gray Team 20 Luoni Team 4 N AC = 420 -1 1

21 Davies Team 19 Young Team 4 N AC = 420 -1 1

14 Dowling Team 15 Curnow Team 4 N TH = 420 -1 1

16 Monaghan Team 11 Johnstone Team 2 N TH +2 170 -1 1

2 Turner Team 28 Lovell Team 2 N TH +2 170 -1 1

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 Buzzard Team 4 N TH = 420 0 0

3 Buzzard Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 4 N 3H = 420 0 0

20 Luoni Team 27 Gray Team 4 N 9H +1 450 1 -1

19 Young Team 21 Davies Team 4 N TH +1 450 1 -1

28 Lovell Team 2 Turner Team 2 N TH +3 200 1 -1

15 Curnow Team 14 Dowling Team 4 N AC +1 450 1 -1

11 Johnstone Team 16 Monaghan Team 3 N TH +2 200 1 -1

12 Grant Team 1 Yule Team 3NT S 7C +1 430 5 -5

22 Foidl Team 13 Bartoli Team 4 N TH = 420 6 -6

8 Robinson Team 24 Gordon Team 4 N AC +1 450 6 -6

26 Watson Team 6 Malthus Team 3NT S 3H = 400 6 -6

5 van Wijngaarden Team 18 Abraham Team 4 N AC +1 450 6 -6

9 Miao Team 17 Bott Team 4 N AC = 420 7 -7

25 Richardson Team 10 Tislevoll Team 3NT S 3H +2 460 7 -7

4 Pemberton Team 23 Roggeveen Team 4 N AC +1 450 12 -12

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by NS +2 460 1
4 by NS +1 450 6
3NT by NS +1 430 1
4 by NS = 420 7
3NT by NS = 400 1
3 by NS +3 230 1
2 by NS +4 230 2
3 by NS +2 200 1
2 by NS +3 200 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
2 by NS +2 170 2
2 by NS +2 170 1
3 by NS = 140 1
2 by NS +1 110 1
3NT by NS -3 -150 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
23 Roggeveen Team	4 Pemberton Team	3NT S	3H	-3		150	-12	12
17 Bott Team	9 Miao Team	2 N	AC	+1	110		-7	7
10 Tislevoll Team	25 Richardson Team	3 N	AC	+1	170		-7	7
18 Abraham Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	2 N	6H	+4	230		-6	6
13 Bartoli Team	22 Foidl Team	2 S	9H	+2	170		-6	6
24 Gordon Team	8 Robinson Team	2 N	8S	+4	230		-6	6
6 Malthus Team	26 Watson Team	3 N	TH	=	140		-6	6
1 Yule Team	12 Grant Team	3 N	6D	+3	230		-5	5
27 Gray Team	20 Luoni Team	4 N	AC	=	420		-1	1
21 Davies Team	19 Young Team	4 N	AC	=	420		-1	1
14 Dowling Team	15 Curnow Team	4 N	TH	=	420		-1	1
16 Monaghan Team	11 Johnstone Team	2 N	TH	+2	170		-1	1
2 Turner Team	28 Lovell Team	2 N	TH	+2	170		-1	1
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 Buzzard Team	4 N	TH	=	420		0	0
3 Buzzard Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 N	3H	=	420		0	0
20 Luoni Team	27 Gray Team	4 N	9H	+1	450		1	-1
19 Young Team	21 Davies Team	4 N	TH	+1	450		1	-1
28 Lovell Team	2 Turner Team	2 N	TH	+3	200		1	-1
15 Curnow Team	14 Dowling Team	4 N	AC	+1	450		1	-1
11 Johnstone Team	16 Monaghan Team	3 N	TH	+2	200		1	-1
12 Grant Team	1 Yule Team	3NT S	7C	+1	430		5	-5
22 Foidl Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 N	TH	=	420		6	-6
8 Robinson Team	24 Gordon Team	4 N	AC	+1	450		6	-6
26 Watson Team	6 Malthus Team	3NT S	3H	=	400		6	-6
5 van Wijngaarden Team	18 Abraham Team	4 N	AC	+1	450		6	-6
9 Miao Team	17 Bott Team	4 N	AC	=	420		7	-7
25 Richardson Team	10 Tislevoll Team	3NT S	3H	+2	460		7	-7
4 Pemberton Team	23 Roggeveen Team	4 N	AC	+1	450		12	-12

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+2	460	1
4 by NS	+1	450	6
3NT by NS	+1	430	1
4 by NS	=	420	7
3NT by NS	=	400	1
3 by NS	+3	230	1
2 by NS	+4	230	2
3 by NS	+2	200	1
2 by NS	+3	200	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
2 by NS	+2	170	2
2 by NS	+2	170	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	+1	110	1
3NT by NS	-3	-150	1