Boards Results

NORTH ISLAND TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 19
Dealer: S, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -40

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

21 CARTNER Team 39 TIPPETT Team 1NT S 5D -3 150 -1 1

3 FOIDL Team 29 YULE Team 2 S 3D = 90 -5 5

33 DRISCOLL Team 22 D'ARCY Team 2 S 3H = 90 0 0

34 WESTOBY Team 8 WALDVOGEL Team 2 S KS = 90 5 -5

38 MOSLEY Team 32 DJOROVIC Team 2 S 5D = 90 5 -5

5 SUN Team 37 BROWN Team 2 W 6S +2 130 -2 2

19 CAMP Team 31 HAYWOOD Team 2 W 5C +2 130 -1 1

9 WARE Team 36 WYLIE Team 2 W 5H +1 140 -6 6

37 BROWN Team 5 SUN Team 3 S 3H -1 50 2 -2

30 LIVINGSTON Team 42 GRANT Team 3 S KS -1 50 0 0

27 TUMILOWICZ Team 24 SIMPSON Team 3 S KS = 110 5 -5

35 GIBBONS Team 7 BADLEY Team 3 S 2D -1 50 0 0

20 KER Team 15 OYSTON Team 3 S 6D = 110 12 -12

18 BOOKER Team 4 INGLIS Team 3 S KS = 110 6 -6

36 WYLIE Team 9 WARE Team 3 S 3D = 110 6 -6

16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 11 HALL Team 3 S 5D -1 50 2 -2

14 LACEY Team 1 WALKER Team 3 S KS = 110 6 -6

12 SOMERVILLE Team 6 CARSON Team 3 S KS -1 50 2 -2

10 DEAN Team 28 HURLEY Team 3 S KS -1 50 2 -2

7 BADLEY Team 35 GIBBONS Team 3 S KS -1 50 0 0

42 GRANT Team 30 LIVINGSTON Team 3 S KS -1 50 0 0

41 DAVIES Team 44 BARON Team 3 E 6C = 110 0 0

23 MCKIRDY Team 17 DONBAVAND Team 3 W 3C = 110 10 -10

39 TIPPETT Team 21 CARTNER Team 3 W 7S = 110 1 -1

40 WOODHALL Team 26 BLACKBURN Team 3 W 5C +1 130 -1 1

32 DJOROVIC Team 38 MOSLEY Team 3 W 3C = 110 -5 5

31 HAYWOOD Team 19 CAMP Team 3 W 3C = 110 1 -1

44 BARON Team 41 DAVIES Team 3 W 3C = 110 0 0

28 HURLEY Team 10 DEAN Team 3 W 5C = 110 -2 2

1 WALKER Team 14 LACEY Team 3 W QC = 110 -6 6

11 HALL Team 16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 3 W 3C = 110 -2 2

6 CARSON Team 12 SOMERVILLE Team 3 W AD +1 130 -2 2

4 INGLIS Team 18 BOOKER Team 3 W 3C = 110 -6 6

29 YULE Team 3 FOIDL Team 3NT W 2C -3 300 5 -5

17 DONBAVAND Team 23 MCKIRDY Team 3NT W 8S = 600 -10 10

15 OYSTON Team 20 KER Team 3NT W QC = 600 -12 12

8 WALDVOGEL Team 34 WESTOBY Team 4 N KS -2 100 -5 5

26 BLACKBURN Team 40 WOODHALL Team 4 S KS -2 100 1 -1

13 EDGINTON Team 43 WATSON Team 4 S 6D -2 100 -5 5

25 BURROWS Team 2 JOHNSTONE Team 4 W 2C -1 100 6 -6

22 D'ARCY Team 33 DRISCOLL Team 4 W 5C -1 100 0 0

43 WATSON Team 13 EDGINTON Team 4 W 3C -1 100 5 -5

2 JOHNSTONE Team 25 BURROWS Team 4 W 2C = 130 -6 6

24 SIMPSON Team 27 TUMILOWICZ Team 5 S 3D -2 100 -5 5

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 19
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by EW -3 300 1
3 by NS = 110 5
4 by EW -1 100 3
2 by NS = 90 4
3 by NS -1 -50 8
4 by NS -2 -100 1
4 by NS -2 -100 2
5 by NS -2 -100 1
3 by EW = -110 9
3 by EW = -110 1
4 by EW = -130 1
3 by EW +1 -130 2
2 by EW +2 -130 2
2 by EW +1 -140 1
1NT by NS -3 -150 1
3NT by EW = -600 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
21 CARTNER Team	39 TIPPETT Team	1NT S	5D	-3		150	-1	1
3 FOIDL Team	29 YULE Team	2 S	3D	=	90		-5	5
33 DRISCOLL Team	22 D'ARCY Team	2 S	3H	=	90		0	0
34 WESTOBY Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	2 S	KS	=	90		5	-5
38 MOSLEY Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	2 S	5D	=	90		5	-5
5 SUN Team	37 BROWN Team	2 W	6S	+2		130	-2	2
19 CAMP Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	2 W	5C	+2		130	-1	1
9 WARE Team	36 WYLIE Team	2 W	5H	+1		140	-6	6
37 BROWN Team	5 SUN Team	3 S	3H	-1		50	2	-2
30 LIVINGSTON Team	42 GRANT Team	3 S	KS	-1		50	0	0
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	24 SIMPSON Team	3 S	KS	=	110		5	-5
35 GIBBONS Team	7 BADLEY Team	3 S	2D	-1		50	0	0
20 KER Team	15 OYSTON Team	3 S	6D	=	110		12	-12
18 BOOKER Team	4 INGLIS Team	3 S	KS	=	110		6	-6
36 WYLIE Team	9 WARE Team	3 S	3D	=	110		6	-6
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	11 HALL Team	3 S	5D	-1		50	2	-2
14 LACEY Team	1 WALKER Team	3 S	KS	=	110		6	-6
12 SOMERVILLE Team	6 CARSON Team	3 S	KS	-1		50	2	-2
10 DEAN Team	28 HURLEY Team	3 S	KS	-1		50	2	-2
7 BADLEY Team	35 GIBBONS Team	3 S	KS	-1		50	0	0
42 GRANT Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	3 S	KS	-1		50	0	0
41 DAVIES Team	44 BARON Team	3 E	6C	=		110	0	0
23 MCKIRDY Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	3 W	3C	=		110	10	-10
39 TIPPETT Team	21 CARTNER Team	3 W	7S	=		110	1	-1
40 WOODHALL Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	3 W	5C	+1		130	-1	1
32 DJOROVIC Team	38 MOSLEY Team	3 W	3C	=		110	-5	5
31 HAYWOOD Team	19 CAMP Team	3 W	3C	=		110	1	-1
44 BARON Team	41 DAVIES Team	3 W	3C	=		110	0	0
28 HURLEY Team	10 DEAN Team	3 W	5C	=		110	-2	2
1 WALKER Team	14 LACEY Team	3 W	QC	=		110	-6	6
11 HALL Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	3 W	3C	=		110	-2	2
6 CARSON Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	3 W	AD	+1		130	-2	2
4 INGLIS Team	18 BOOKER Team	3 W	3C	=		110	-6	6
29 YULE Team	3 FOIDL Team	3NT W	2C	-3	300		5	-5
17 DONBAVAND Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	3NT W	8S	=		600	-10	10
15 OYSTON Team	20 KER Team	3NT W	QC	=		600	-12	12
8 WALDVOGEL Team	34 WESTOBY Team	4 N	KS	-2		100	-5	5
26 BLACKBURN Team	40 WOODHALL Team	4 S	KS	-2		100	1	-1
13 EDGINTON Team	43 WATSON Team	4 S	6D	-2		100	-5	5
25 BURROWS Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	4 W	2C	-1	100		6	-6
22 D'ARCY Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	4 W	5C	-1	100		0	0
43 WATSON Team	13 EDGINTON Team	4 W	3C	-1	100		5	-5
2 JOHNSTONE Team	25 BURROWS Team	4 W	2C	=		130	-6	6
24 SIMPSON Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	5 S	3D	-2		100	-5	5

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 19
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by EW	-3	300	1
3 by NS	=	110	5
4 by EW	-1	100	3
2 by NS	=	90	4
3 by NS	-1	-50	8
4 by NS	-2	-100	1
4 by NS	-2	-100	2
5 by NS	-2	-100	1
3 by EW	=	-110	9
3 by EW	=	-110	1
4 by EW	=	-130	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	2
2 by EW	+2	-130	2
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
1NT by NS	-3	-150	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	2