Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 6

Board No: 19
Dealer: S, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -20

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

20 Luoni Team 1 Yule Team Adjusted score 0 0

2 Turner Team 19 Young Team 3 N 2D -1 50 -4 4

28 Lovell Team 15 Curnow Team 3 N 2D -3 150 -6 6

9 Miao Team 25 Richardson Team 3 N 2D -1 50 -6 6

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 18 Abraham Team 3 N 2D -1 50 -6 6

3 Buzzard Team 16 Monaghan Team 3 N 2D -1 50 -6 6

25 Richardson Team 9 Miao Team 3NT W 3S -2 200 6 -6

23 Roggeveen Team 12 Grant Team 3 N 4D -3 150 -8 8

6 Malthus Team 8 Robinson Team 3 N 5D -1 50 2 -2

21 Davies Team 11 Johnstone Team 3NT E 7C = 600 -11 11

18 Abraham Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3NT W 8S -2 200 6 -6

16 Monaghan Team 3 Buzzard Team 3NT E 9S -2 200 6 -6

8 Robinson Team 6 Malthus Team 3 W AS = 110 -2 2

4 Pemberton Team 24 Gordon Team 3 W AS +1 130 -1 1

11 Johnstone Team 21 Davies Team 1NT W AS = 90 11 -11

27 Gray Team 14 Dowling Team 3 W AS = 110 1 -1

13 Bartoli Team 17 Bott Team 4 W AS -2 200 0 0

14 Dowling Team 27 Gray Team 3 W AS +1 130 -1 1

15 Curnow Team 28 Lovell Team 3 W AS -1 100 6 -6

19 Young Team 2 Turner Team 3 W AS -1 100 4 -4

24 Gordon Team 4 Pemberton Team 3 N JD -2 100 1 -1

26 Watson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 3 N JD -2 100 0 0

5 van Wijngaarden Team 26 Watson Team 2 N JD -2 100 0 0

1 Yule Team 20 Luoni Team 4 W KS -2 200 0 0

22 Foidl Team 10 Tislevoll Team 1NT W KS +1 120 0 0

17 Bott Team 13 Bartoli Team 4 W KS -2 200 0 0

12 Grant Team 23 Roggeveen Team 4 W KS -2 200 8 -8

10 Tislevoll Team 22 Foidl Team 3 W KS = 110 0 0

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 19
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -2 200 4
3NT by EW -2 200 1
3NT by EW -2 200 2
3 by EW -1 100 2
3 by NS -1 -50 5
1NT by EW = -90 1
2 by NS -2 -100 1
3 by NS -2 -100 2
3 by EW = -110 3
1NT by EW +1 -120 1
3 by EW +1 -130 2
3 by NS -3 -150 2
3NT by EW = -600 1
N by NS = 0 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
20 Luoni Team	1 Yule Team				Adjusted score		0	0
2 Turner Team	19 Young Team	3 N	2D	-1		50	-4	4
28 Lovell Team	15 Curnow Team	3 N	2D	-3		150	-6	6
9 Miao Team	25 Richardson Team	3 N	2D	-1		50	-6	6
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	18 Abraham Team	3 N	2D	-1		50	-6	6
3 Buzzard Team	16 Monaghan Team	3 N	2D	-1		50	-6	6
25 Richardson Team	9 Miao Team	3NT W	3S	-2	200		6	-6
23 Roggeveen Team	12 Grant Team	3 N	4D	-3		150	-8	8
6 Malthus Team	8 Robinson Team	3 N	5D	-1		50	2	-2
21 Davies Team	11 Johnstone Team	3NT E	7C	=		600	-11	11
18 Abraham Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3NT W	8S	-2	200		6	-6
16 Monaghan Team	3 Buzzard Team	3NT E	9S	-2	200		6	-6
8 Robinson Team	6 Malthus Team	3 W	AS	=		110	-2	2
4 Pemberton Team	24 Gordon Team	3 W	AS	+1		130	-1	1
11 Johnstone Team	21 Davies Team	1NT W	AS	=		90	11	-11
27 Gray Team	14 Dowling Team	3 W	AS	=		110	1	-1
13 Bartoli Team	17 Bott Team	4 W	AS	-2	200		0	0
14 Dowling Team	27 Gray Team	3 W	AS	+1		130	-1	1
15 Curnow Team	28 Lovell Team	3 W	AS	-1	100		6	-6
19 Young Team	2 Turner Team	3 W	AS	-1	100		4	-4
24 Gordon Team	4 Pemberton Team	3 N	JD	-2		100	1	-1
26 Watson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	3 N	JD	-2		100	0	0
5 van Wijngaarden Team	26 Watson Team	2 N	JD	-2		100	0	0
1 Yule Team	20 Luoni Team	4 W	KS	-2	200		0	0
22 Foidl Team	10 Tislevoll Team	1NT W	KS	+1		120	0	0
17 Bott Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 W	KS	-2	200		0	0
12 Grant Team	23 Roggeveen Team	4 W	KS	-2	200		8	-8
10 Tislevoll Team	22 Foidl Team	3 W	KS	=		110	0	0

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 19
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-2	200	4
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	2
3 by EW	-1	100	2
3 by NS	-1	-50	5
1NT by EW	=	-90	1
2 by NS	-2	-100	1
3 by NS	-2	-100	2
3 by EW	=	-110	3
1NT by EW	+1	-120	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	2
3 by NS	-3	-150	2
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
N by NS	=	0	1