Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 6

Board No: 18
Dealer: E, Vul: NS, Room Datum: 130

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

20 Luoni Team 1 Yule Team 3NT N AC = 600 -5 5

19 Young Team 2 Turner Team 2 E KH -3 150 3 -3

16 Monaghan Team 3 Buzzard Team 4 N 2D -1 100 0 0

24 Gordon Team 4 Pemberton Team 1NT N 6S +3 180 1 -1

26 Watson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 2 E KH -2 100 9 -9

8 Robinson Team 6 Malthus Team 4 S 9S -1 100 -6 6

18 Abraham Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 4 S 9S -1 100 0 0

6 Malthus Team 8 Robinson Team 2 E JC -3 150 6 -6

25 Richardson Team 9 Miao Team 3NT N 2D -2 200 -8 8

22 Foidl Team 10 Tislevoll Team 2 E KH -1 50 -11 11

21 Davies Team 11 Johnstone Team 3NT N AC = 600 0 0

23 Roggeveen Team 12 Grant Team 2 E KH -2 100 -1 1

17 Bott Team 13 Bartoli Team 2 N AC = 110 5 -5

27 Gray Team 14 Dowling Team 3NT N 3C = 600 12 -12

28 Lovell Team 15 Curnow Team 1 E JC -1 50 -3 3

3 Buzzard Team 16 Monaghan Team 4 S 9S -1 100 0 0

13 Bartoli Team 17 Bott Team 4 S 7S -1 100 -5 5

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 18 Abraham Team 4 N 9S -1 100 0 0

2 Turner Team 19 Young Team 2 E KH -1 50 -3 3

1 Yule Team 20 Luoni Team 4X E 6H -4 800 5 -5

11 Johnstone Team 21 Davies Team 3NT N 4S = 600 0 0

10 Tislevoll Team 22 Foidl Team 3NT N 3C = 600 11 -11

12 Grant Team 23 Roggeveen Team 2 N 2D +1 140 1 -1

4 Pemberton Team 24 Gordon Team 1NT N AC +2 150 -1 1

9 Miao Team 25 Richardson Team 2 E KH -3 150 8 -8

5 van Wijngaarden Team 26 Watson Team 3 S 9S -3 300 -9 9

14 Dowling Team 27 Gray Team 4 S 9S -1 100 -12 12

15 Curnow Team 28 Lovell Team 3 S KC = 140 3 -3

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 18
Contract Result Score Frequency
4X by EW -4 800 1
3NT by NS = 600 5
1NT by NS +3 180 1
2 by EW -3 150 3
1NT by NS +2 150 1
3 by NS = 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 1
2 by NS = 110 1
2 by EW -2 100 2
2 by EW -1 50 2
1 by EW -1 50 1
4 by NS -1 -100 5
4 by NS -1 -100 2
3NT by NS -2 -200 1
3 by NS -3 -300 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
20 Luoni Team	1 Yule Team	3NT N	AC	=	600		-5	5
19 Young Team	2 Turner Team	2 E	KH	-3	150		3	-3
16 Monaghan Team	3 Buzzard Team	4 N	2D	-1		100	0	0
24 Gordon Team	4 Pemberton Team	1NT N	6S	+3	180		1	-1
26 Watson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	2 E	KH	-2	100		9	-9
8 Robinson Team	6 Malthus Team	4 S	9S	-1		100	-6	6
18 Abraham Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 S	9S	-1		100	0	0
6 Malthus Team	8 Robinson Team	2 E	JC	-3	150		6	-6
25 Richardson Team	9 Miao Team	3NT N	2D	-2		200	-8	8
22 Foidl Team	10 Tislevoll Team	2 E	KH	-1	50		-11	11
21 Davies Team	11 Johnstone Team	3NT N	AC	=	600		0	0
23 Roggeveen Team	12 Grant Team	2 E	KH	-2	100		-1	1
17 Bott Team	13 Bartoli Team	2 N	AC	=	110		5	-5
27 Gray Team	14 Dowling Team	3NT N	3C	=	600		12	-12
28 Lovell Team	15 Curnow Team	1 E	JC	-1	50		-3	3
3 Buzzard Team	16 Monaghan Team	4 S	9S	-1		100	0	0
13 Bartoli Team	17 Bott Team	4 S	7S	-1		100	-5	5
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	18 Abraham Team	4 N	9S	-1		100	0	0
2 Turner Team	19 Young Team	2 E	KH	-1	50		-3	3
1 Yule Team	20 Luoni Team	4X E	6H	-4	800		5	-5
11 Johnstone Team	21 Davies Team	3NT N	4S	=	600		0	0
10 Tislevoll Team	22 Foidl Team	3NT N	3C	=	600		11	-11
12 Grant Team	23 Roggeveen Team	2 N	2D	+1	140		1	-1
4 Pemberton Team	24 Gordon Team	1NT N	AC	+2	150		-1	1
9 Miao Team	25 Richardson Team	2 E	KH	-3	150		8	-8
5 van Wijngaarden Team	26 Watson Team	3 S	9S	-3		300	-9	9
14 Dowling Team	27 Gray Team	4 S	9S	-1		100	-12	12
15 Curnow Team	28 Lovell Team	3 S	KC	=	140		3	-3

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 18
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4X by EW	-4	800	1
3NT by NS	=	600	5
1NT by NS	+3	180	1
2 by EW	-3	150	3
1NT by NS	+2	150	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	1
2 by NS	=	110	1
2 by EW	-2	100	2
2 by EW	-1	50	2
1 by EW	-1	50	1
4 by NS	-1	-100	5
4 by NS	-1	-100	2
3NT by NS	-2	-200	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1