Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 17
Dealer: N, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: 60

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Yule Team 12 Grant Team 3 W TC -2 100 -3 3

2 Turner Team 28 Lovell Team 3 W 3S -2 100 0 0

3 Buzzard Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 S 6D -1 50 -3 3

4 Pemberton Team 23 Roggeveen Team 3 N TH -2 100 -5 5

5 van Wijngaarden Team 18 Abraham Team 2 N TH = 110 -1 1

6 Malthus Team 26 Watson Team 1NT W TC = 90 0 0

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 Buzzard Team 3 E 3H -1 50 3 -3

8 Robinson Team 24 Gordon Team 2 N KH = 110 0 0

9 Miao Team 17 Bott Team 3 W TC -2 100 0 0

10 Tislevoll Team 25 Richardson Team 2 N 5C = 110 5 -5

11 Johnstone Team 16 Monaghan Team 3 W 6S -2 100 2 -2

12 Grant Team 1 Yule Team 3 W JH -4 200 3 -3

13 Bartoli Team 22 Foidl Team 3 W 2S -2 100 4 -4

14 Dowling Team 15 Curnow Team 2 N 2H -1 50 -4 4

15 Curnow Team 14 Dowling Team 3 W AD -2 100 4 -4

16 Monaghan Team 11 Johnstone Team 2 W TC -1 50 -2 2

17 Bott Team 9 Miao Team 3 W AD -2 100 0 0

18 Abraham Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 2 N 6H +1 140 1 -1

19 Young Team 21 Davies Team 3 W AD -1 50 3 -3

20 Luoni Team 27 Gray Team 2 N 6H = 110 0 0

21 Davies Team 19 Young Team 3 N 2H -1 50 -3 3

22 Foidl Team 13 Bartoli Team 3NT S 4H -1 50 -4 4

23 Roggeveen Team 4 Pemberton Team 3 W AD -2 100 5 -5

24 Gordon Team 8 Robinson Team 2NT S KC = 120 0 0

25 Richardson Team 10 Tislevoll Team 3NT S 3H -2 100 -5 5

26 Watson Team 6 Malthus Team 4 N TH -2 100 0 0

27 Gray Team 20 Luoni Team 3 W 6S -2 100 0 0

28 Lovell Team 2 Turner Team 2 N 2H = 110 0 0

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 17
Contract Result Score Frequency
3 by EW -4 200 1
2 by NS +1 140 1
2NT by NS = 120 1
2 by NS = 110 5
3 by EW -2 100 9
3 by EW -1 50 1
2 by EW -1 50 1
3 by EW -1 50 1
3 by NS -1 -50 1
2 by NS -1 -50 1
3 by NS -1 -50 1
3NT by NS -1 -50 1
1NT by EW = -90 1
3 by NS -2 -100 1
3NT by NS -2 -100 1
4 by NS -2 -100 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Yule Team	12 Grant Team	3 W	TC	-2	100		-3	3
2 Turner Team	28 Lovell Team	3 W	3S	-2	100		0	0
3 Buzzard Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 S	6D	-1		50	-3	3
4 Pemberton Team	23 Roggeveen Team	3 N	TH	-2		100	-5	5
5 van Wijngaarden Team	18 Abraham Team	2 N	TH	=	110		-1	1
6 Malthus Team	26 Watson Team	1NT W	TC	=		90	0	0
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 Buzzard Team	3 E	3H	-1	50		3	-3
8 Robinson Team	24 Gordon Team	2 N	KH	=	110		0	0
9 Miao Team	17 Bott Team	3 W	TC	-2	100		0	0
10 Tislevoll Team	25 Richardson Team	2 N	5C	=	110		5	-5
11 Johnstone Team	16 Monaghan Team	3 W	6S	-2	100		2	-2
12 Grant Team	1 Yule Team	3 W	JH	-4	200		3	-3
13 Bartoli Team	22 Foidl Team	3 W	2S	-2	100		4	-4
14 Dowling Team	15 Curnow Team	2 N	2H	-1		50	-4	4
15 Curnow Team	14 Dowling Team	3 W	AD	-2	100		4	-4
16 Monaghan Team	11 Johnstone Team	2 W	TC	-1	50		-2	2
17 Bott Team	9 Miao Team	3 W	AD	-2	100		0	0
18 Abraham Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	2 N	6H	+1	140		1	-1
19 Young Team	21 Davies Team	3 W	AD	-1	50		3	-3
20 Luoni Team	27 Gray Team	2 N	6H	=	110		0	0
21 Davies Team	19 Young Team	3 N	2H	-1		50	-3	3
22 Foidl Team	13 Bartoli Team	3NT S	4H	-1		50	-4	4
23 Roggeveen Team	4 Pemberton Team	3 W	AD	-2	100		5	-5
24 Gordon Team	8 Robinson Team	2NT S	KC	=	120		0	0
25 Richardson Team	10 Tislevoll Team	3NT S	3H	-2		100	-5	5
26 Watson Team	6 Malthus Team	4 N	TH	-2		100	0	0
27 Gray Team	20 Luoni Team	3 W	6S	-2	100		0	0
28 Lovell Team	2 Turner Team	2 N	2H	=	110		0	0

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 17
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-4	200	1
2 by NS	+1	140	1
2NT by NS	=	120	1
2 by NS	=	110	5
3 by EW	-2	100	9
3 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
3 by EW	-1	50	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1
3NT by NS	-1	-50	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	1
3 by NS	-2	-100	1
3NT by NS	-2	-100	1
4 by NS	-2	-100	1