Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 16
Dealer: W, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 110

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

10 Tislevoll Team 25 Richardson Team 5 W 4S -2 200 6 -6

13 Bartoli Team 22 Foidl Team 5 W 4S -2 200 2 -2

1 Yule Team 12 Grant Team 4 W 4S -2 200 2 -2

26 Watson Team 6 Malthus Team 2 S AD +2 170 6 -6

15 Curnow Team 14 Dowling Team 3 S 7S = 140 0 0

28 Lovell Team 2 Turner Team 2 S 5H +1 140 0 0

27 Gray Team 20 Luoni Team 3 S 9S = 140 5 -5

24 Gordon Team 8 Robinson Team 3 S 9S = 140 0 0

23 Roggeveen Team 4 Pemberton Team 3 S 4C = 140 6 -6

22 Foidl Team 13 Bartoli Team 3 S 4C = 140 -2 2

21 Davies Team 19 Young Team 3 S AD = 140 6 -6

18 Abraham Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 3 S AD = 140 5 -5

17 Bott Team 9 Miao Team 3 S AD = 140 0 0

16 Monaghan Team 11 Johnstone Team 3 S AD = 140 0 0

14 Dowling Team 15 Curnow Team 3 S AD = 140 0 0

12 Grant Team 1 Yule Team 3 S 3H = 140 -2 2

11 Johnstone Team 16 Monaghan Team 2 S 9S +1 140 0 0

9 Miao Team 17 Bott Team 2 S AD +1 140 0 0

8 Robinson Team 24 Gordon Team 2 S AD +1 140 0 0

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 Buzzard Team 3 N AD = 140 0 0

3 Buzzard Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 N 7S = 140 0 0

2 Turner Team 28 Lovell Team 2 S 5H +1 140 0 0

20 Luoni Team 27 Gray Team 3 S 4C -1 50 -5 5

6 Malthus Team 26 Watson Team 3 S 2D -1 50 -6 6

5 van Wijngaarden Team 18 Abraham Team 4 S AD -1 50 -5 5

25 Richardson Team 10 Tislevoll Team 3 S 4C -1 50 -6 6

19 Young Team 21 Davies Team 3 E AS = 110 -6 6

4 Pemberton Team 23 Roggeveen Team 3 E AS = 110 -6 6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 16
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -2 200 1
5 by EW -2 200 2
2 by NS +2 170 1
3 by NS = 140 2
3 by NS = 140 11
2 by NS +1 140 5
4 by NS -1 -50 1
3 by NS -1 -50 3
3 by EW = -110 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
10 Tislevoll Team	25 Richardson Team	5 W	4S	-2	200		6	-6
13 Bartoli Team	22 Foidl Team	5 W	4S	-2	200		2	-2
1 Yule Team	12 Grant Team	4 W	4S	-2	200		2	-2
26 Watson Team	6 Malthus Team	2 S	AD	+2	170		6	-6
15 Curnow Team	14 Dowling Team	3 S	7S	=	140		0	0
28 Lovell Team	2 Turner Team	2 S	5H	+1	140		0	0
27 Gray Team	20 Luoni Team	3 S	9S	=	140		5	-5
24 Gordon Team	8 Robinson Team	3 S	9S	=	140		0	0
23 Roggeveen Team	4 Pemberton Team	3 S	4C	=	140		6	-6
22 Foidl Team	13 Bartoli Team	3 S	4C	=	140		-2	2
21 Davies Team	19 Young Team	3 S	AD	=	140		6	-6
18 Abraham Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	3 S	AD	=	140		5	-5
17 Bott Team	9 Miao Team	3 S	AD	=	140		0	0
16 Monaghan Team	11 Johnstone Team	3 S	AD	=	140		0	0
14 Dowling Team	15 Curnow Team	3 S	AD	=	140		0	0
12 Grant Team	1 Yule Team	3 S	3H	=	140		-2	2
11 Johnstone Team	16 Monaghan Team	2 S	9S	+1	140		0	0
9 Miao Team	17 Bott Team	2 S	AD	+1	140		0	0
8 Robinson Team	24 Gordon Team	2 S	AD	+1	140		0	0
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 Buzzard Team	3 N	AD	=	140		0	0
3 Buzzard Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 N	7S	=	140		0	0
2 Turner Team	28 Lovell Team	2 S	5H	+1	140		0	0
20 Luoni Team	27 Gray Team	3 S	4C	-1		50	-5	5
6 Malthus Team	26 Watson Team	3 S	2D	-1		50	-6	6
5 van Wijngaarden Team	18 Abraham Team	4 S	AD	-1		50	-5	5
25 Richardson Team	10 Tislevoll Team	3 S	4C	-1		50	-6	6
19 Young Team	21 Davies Team	3 E	AS	=		110	-6	6
4 Pemberton Team	23 Roggeveen Team	3 E	AS	=		110	-6	6

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 16
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-2	200	1
5 by EW	-2	200	2
2 by NS	+2	170	1
3 by NS	=	140	2
3 by NS	=	140	11
2 by NS	+1	140	5
4 by NS	-1	-50	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	3
3 by EW	=	-110	2