Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
12 Grant Team	26 Watson Team				Adjusted score			0	0
2 Turner Team	16 Monaghan Team	2 E	2C	+3		200		0	0
3 Buzzard Team	17 Bott Team	3 E	7C	+2		200		6	-6
5 van Wijngaarden Team	19 Young Team	3 E	2C	+2		200		6	-6
23 Roggeveen Team	9 Miao Team	3 E	6C	+2		200		6	-6
22 Foidl Team	8 Robinson Team	3 E	QH	+2		200		6	-6
16 Monaghan Team	2 Turner Team	3 E	7C	+2		200		0	0
14 Dowling Team	28 Lovell Team	4 W	AC	=		420		-8	8
26 Watson Team	12 Grant Team	4 W	AC	=		420		0	0
4 Pemberton Team	18 Abraham Team	4 W	AC	=		420		1	-1
19 Young Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	4 E	6C	+1		450		-6	6
27 Gray Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 E	7C	+1		450		0	0
25 Richardson Team	11 Johnstone Team	4 E	4C	+1		450		0	0
24 Gordon Team	10 Tislevoll Team	4 E	QH	+1		450		0	0
6 Malthus Team	20 Luoni Team	4 E	QH	+1		450		0	0
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	21 Davies Team	4 E	QH	+1		450		0	0
21 Davies Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 E	QH	+1		450		0	0
20 Luoni Team	6 Malthus Team	4 E	3D	+1		450		0	0
10 Tislevoll Team	24 Gordon Team	4 E	4C	+1		450		0	0
18 Abraham Team	4 Pemberton Team	4 E	QH	+1		450		-1	1
17 Bott Team	3 Buzzard Team	4 E	6C	+1		450		-6	6
8 Robinson Team	22 Foidl Team	4 E	6C	+1		450		-6	6
1 Yule Team	15 Curnow Team	4 E	5C	+1		450		6	-6
13 Bartoli Team	27 Gray Team	4 E	4C	+1		450		0	0
9 Miao Team	23 Roggeveen Team	4 E	4C	+1		450		-6	6
11 Johnstone Team	25 Richardson Team	4 E	6C	+1		450		0	0
15 Curnow Team	1 Yule Team	4X E	QH	+1		690		-6	6
28 Lovell Team	14 Dowling Team	5 S	AH	-2		100		8	-8

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 14
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by NS	-2	-100	1
3 by EW	+2	-200	5
2 by EW	+3	-200	1
4 by EW	=	-420	3
4 by EW	+1	-450	16
4X by EW	+1	-690	1
N by NS	=	0	1

Alternative display format