Boards Results

NORTH ISLAND TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 29
Dealer: N, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 50
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 WALKER Team 21 CARTNER Team 3 N 5C -2 200 -3 3

2 JOHNSTONE Team 40 WOODHALL Team 3 W JD -2 200 3 -3

3 FOIDL Team 11 HALL Team 2 E KC = 110 -6 6

4 INGLIS Team 26 BLACKBURN Team 3 E AD -1 100 -1 1

5 SUN Team 15 OYSTON Team 2 N JH +1 140 6 -6

6 CARSON Team 42 GRANT Team 3 S 6H -1 100 -5 5

7 BADLEY Team 14 LACEY Team 3 W JD = 110 5 -5

8 WALDVOGEL Team 36 WYLIE Team 3 S 7D = 140 0 0

9 WARE Team 20 KER Team 3X E 2S -1 200 3 -3

10 DEAN Team 17 DONBAVAND Team 3 N JH +1 170 2 -2

11 HALL Team 3 FOIDL Team 2 N JH +1 140 6 -6

12 SOMERVILLE Team 43 WATSON Team 3 N 4C = 140 1 -1

13 EDGINTON Team 33 DRISCOLL Team 2 N 4C +1 140 0 0

14 LACEY Team 7 BADLEY Team 4 S QC -3 300 -5 5

15 OYSTON Team 5 SUN Team 3 S QH -1 100 -6 6

16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 22 D'ARCY Team 3 E AD -1 100 6 -6

17 DONBAVAND Team 10 DEAN Team 3 S 6H = 110 -2 2

18 BOOKER Team 19 CAMP Team 2 N 2C +1 140 1 -1

19 CAMP Team 18 BOOKER Team 2 N 5C = 110 -1 1

20 KER Team 9 WARE Team 2 E AH -1 100 -3 3

21 CARTNER Team 1 WALKER Team 2 E 9S = 110 3 -3

22 D'ARCY Team 16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team 3 E AD = 140 -6 6

23 MCKIRDY Team 34 WESTOBY Team 4X W JD -3 800 14 -14

24 SIMPSON Team 30 LIVINGSTON Team 3 N 5C = 140 0 0

25 BURROWS Team 39 TIPPETT Team 4 N 5C -1 100 -5 5

26 BLACKBURN Team 4 INGLIS Team 2 N JH +1 140 1 -1

27 TUMILOWICZ Team 32 DJOROVIC Team 4 W JD -3 300 9 -9

28 HURLEY Team 41 DAVIES Team 3 S QC -1 100 0 0

29 YULE Team 37 BROWN Team 2 E AH -2 200 2 -2

30 LIVINGSTON Team 24 SIMPSON Team 2 N JH +1 140 0 0

31 HAYWOOD Team 44 BARON Team 3 W JD = 110 -7 7

32 DJOROVIC Team 27 TUMILOWICZ Team 2 E KC = 110 -9 9

33 DRISCOLL Team 13 EDGINTON Team 2 N JH +1 140 0 0

34 WESTOBY Team 23 MCKIRDY Team 2 E KC = 110 -14 14

35 GIBBONS Team 38 MOSLEY Team 3 S 6H = 110 7 -7

36 WYLIE Team 8 WALDVOGEL Team 2 S 6H +1 140 0 0

37 BROWN Team 29 YULE Team 2 N TH +1 140 -2 2

38 MOSLEY Team 35 GIBBONS Team 5 S QC -2 200 -7 7

39 TIPPETT Team 25 BURROWS Team 2 E 8S -1 100 5 -5

40 WOODHALL Team 2 JOHNSTONE Team 3 E AH -1 100 -3 3

41 DAVIES Team 28 HURLEY Team 3 S QC -1 100 0 0

42 GRANT Team 6 CARSON Team 3 E 3S -1 100 5 -5

43 WATSON Team 12 SOMERVILLE Team 3 E AD -1 100 -1 1

44 BARON Team 31 HAYWOOD Team 3 W JD -2 200 7 -7

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Jump to
Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract Result Score Frequency
4X by EW -3 800 1
4 by EW -3 300 1
3 by EW -2 200 2
2 by EW -2 200 1
3X by EW -1 200 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
3 by NS = 140 2
3 by NS = 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 8
3 by NS = 110 2
2 by NS = 110 1
3 by EW -1 100 5
2 by EW -1 100 2
4 by NS -1 -100 1
3 by NS -1 -100 3
3 by NS -1 -100 1
2 by EW = -110 4
3 by EW = -110 2
3 by EW = -140 1
3 by NS -2 -200 1
5 by NS -2 -200 1
4 by NS -3 -300 1

Return to this event's results

Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 WALKER Team	21 CARTNER Team	3 N	5C	-2		200	-3	3
2 JOHNSTONE Team	40 WOODHALL Team	3 W	JD	-2	200		3	-3
3 FOIDL Team	11 HALL Team	2 E	KC	=		110	-6	6
4 INGLIS Team	26 BLACKBURN Team	3 E	AD	-1	100		-1	1
5 SUN Team	15 OYSTON Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		6	-6
6 CARSON Team	42 GRANT Team	3 S	6H	-1		100	-5	5
7 BADLEY Team	14 LACEY Team	3 W	JD	=		110	5	-5
8 WALDVOGEL Team	36 WYLIE Team	3 S	7D	=	140		0	0
9 WARE Team	20 KER Team	3X E	2S	-1	200		3	-3
10 DEAN Team	17 DONBAVAND Team	3 N	JH	+1	170		2	-2
11 HALL Team	3 FOIDL Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		6	-6
12 SOMERVILLE Team	43 WATSON Team	3 N	4C	=	140		1	-1
13 EDGINTON Team	33 DRISCOLL Team	2 N	4C	+1	140		0	0
14 LACEY Team	7 BADLEY Team	4 S	QC	-3		300	-5	5
15 OYSTON Team	5 SUN Team	3 S	QH	-1		100	-6	6
16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	22 D'ARCY Team	3 E	AD	-1	100		6	-6
17 DONBAVAND Team	10 DEAN Team	3 S	6H	=	110		-2	2
18 BOOKER Team	19 CAMP Team	2 N	2C	+1	140		1	-1
19 CAMP Team	18 BOOKER Team	2 N	5C	=	110		-1	1
20 KER Team	9 WARE Team	2 E	AH	-1	100		-3	3
21 CARTNER Team	1 WALKER Team	2 E	9S	=		110	3	-3
22 D'ARCY Team	16 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	3 E	AD	=		140	-6	6
23 MCKIRDY Team	34 WESTOBY Team	4X W	JD	-3	800		14	-14
24 SIMPSON Team	30 LIVINGSTON Team	3 N	5C	=	140		0	0
25 BURROWS Team	39 TIPPETT Team	4 N	5C	-1		100	-5	5
26 BLACKBURN Team	4 INGLIS Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		1	-1
27 TUMILOWICZ Team	32 DJOROVIC Team	4 W	JD	-3	300		9	-9
28 HURLEY Team	41 DAVIES Team	3 S	QC	-1		100	0	0
29 YULE Team	37 BROWN Team	2 E	AH	-2	200		2	-2
30 LIVINGSTON Team	24 SIMPSON Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		0	0
31 HAYWOOD Team	44 BARON Team	3 W	JD	=		110	-7	7
32 DJOROVIC Team	27 TUMILOWICZ Team	2 E	KC	=		110	-9	9
33 DRISCOLL Team	13 EDGINTON Team	2 N	JH	+1	140		0	0
34 WESTOBY Team	23 MCKIRDY Team	2 E	KC	=		110	-14	14
35 GIBBONS Team	38 MOSLEY Team	3 S	6H	=	110		7	-7
36 WYLIE Team	8 WALDVOGEL Team	2 S	6H	+1	140		0	0
37 BROWN Team	29 YULE Team	2 N	TH	+1	140		-2	2
38 MOSLEY Team	35 GIBBONS Team	5 S	QC	-2		200	-7	7
39 TIPPETT Team	25 BURROWS Team	2 E	8S	-1	100		5	-5
40 WOODHALL Team	2 JOHNSTONE Team	3 E	AH	-1	100		-3	3
41 DAVIES Team	28 HURLEY Team	3 S	QC	-1		100	0	0
42 GRANT Team	6 CARSON Team	3 E	3S	-1	100		5	-5
43 WATSON Team	12 SOMERVILLE Team	3 E	AD	-1	100		-1	1
44 BARON Team	31 HAYWOOD Team	3 W	JD	-2	200		7	-7

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4X by EW	-3	800	1
4 by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-2	200	2
2 by EW	-2	200	1
3X by EW	-1	200	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
3 by NS	=	140	2
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	8
3 by NS	=	110	2
2 by NS	=	110	1
3 by EW	-1	100	5
2 by EW	-1	100	2
4 by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	3
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by EW	=	-110	4
3 by EW	=	-110	2
3 by EW	=	-140	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
4 by NS	-3	-300	1