Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
6 EDGINTON	11 HODGE	3NT S	6S	=	400			10	-10
10 MIAO	7 ZHANG	4 N	KS	+2	480			7	-7
2 WEHIPEIHANA	14 WIGGINS	4 N	KS	+2	480			6	-6
3 LIVINGSTON	1 FISHER	4 N	JC	+1	450			2	-2
9 TUMILOWICZ	8 WHYTE	4 N	2S	+2	480			2	-2
13 BURROWS	4 LENNON	4 N	TD	+1	450			2	-2
12 WARE	5 HUMPHREY	4 S	QS	+2	480			1	-1
5 HUMPHREY	12 WARE	4 N	JC	+1	450			-1	1
1 FISHER	3 LIVINGSTON	3NT S	6S	=	400			-2	2
4 LENNON	13 BURROWS	3NT S	6S	=	400			-2	2
8 WHYTE	9 TUMILOWICZ	3NT S	3S	=	400			-2	2
14 WIGGINS	2 WEHIPEIHANA	3 N	KS	+3	230			-6	6
7 ZHANG	10 MIAO	2 N	TD	+3	200			-7	7
11 HODGE	6 EDGINTON	3NT S	5S	-1		50		-10	10

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

BOARD 9
BD: 9	T	Dlr: N
	AKJ965	Vul: EW
	QJ5
	A64
QJ865		K932
T82		Q43
2		T986
KQ85		J9
	A74
	7
	AK743
	T732
NT N 4 5 5 - 3     15   S 4 5 5 - 3   8   6 E - - - 1 -     11   W - - - 1 -

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by NS	+2	480	3
4 by NS	+2	480	1
4 by NS	+1	450	3
3NT by NS	=	400	4
3 by NS	+3	230	1
2 by NS	+3	200	1
3NT by NS	-1	-50	1

Alternative display format