Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
4 LIVINGSTON Team	8 SOLOMON Team	3NTX W	2C	-3	800			13	-13
33 HAJMASI Team	32 CHANG Team	4NTX S	2D	-4		800		-12	12
11 FOIDL Team	5 GROVER Team	2X S	2D	-2		300		-5	5
27 ROBERTSON Team	9 FISHER Team	4 S	2H	-3		150		-6	6
9 FISHER Team	27 ROBERTSON Team	1NT W	2H	-1	100			6	-6
19 YANAGISAWA Team	1 Wiggins Team	2 S	3C	-3		150		-8	8
10 WOODHALL Team	14 DAVIES Team	1NT W	3H	-2	200			8	-8
26 PALMER Team	25 JACOB Team	2NT W	3H	-1	100			-5	5
13 TISLEVOLL Team	31 GRANT Team	1NT W	3H	=		90		-7	7
5 GROVER Team	11 FOIDL Team	1NT W	3H	=		90		5	-5
28 CARTER Team	21 CORMACK Team	4 N	3S	-4		200		-7	7
2 DRISCOLL Team	16 LEWIS Team	4 N	3S	-4		200		-4	4
6 BOUGHEY Team	15 CORNELL Team	3 N	4C	-2		100		-14	14
15 CORNELL Team	6 BOUGHEY Team	2NTX W	4C	-3	800			14	-14
23 CURRIE Team	30 MCENTEGART Team	3NT W	4C	-3	300			3	-3
3 CARSON Team	22 LEI Team	3NTX W	4H	-3	800			14	-14
29 ASHWELL Team	20 STRETTON Team	2 N	5C	-1		50		-4	4
18 MORRIS Team	34 O'CONNOR Team	3 N	5H	=	140			-8	8
16 LEWIS Team	2 DRISCOLL Team	3 N	6H	-1		50		4	-4
17 CAMP Team	7 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	3 N	6S	-2		100		-7	7
14 DAVIES Team	10 WOODHALL Team	4 N	6S	-3		150		-8	8
8 SOLOMON Team	4 LIVINGSTON Team	2 N	6S	-1		50		-13	13
24 GENC Team	12 LICHTNECKER Team	3X E	7D	-1	200			3	-3
12 LICHTNECKER Team	24 GENC Team	2 E	7D	-1	100			-3	3
25 JACOB Team	26 PALMER Team	2NT W	7H	-3	300			5	-5
30 MCENTEGART Team	23 CURRIE Team	1NT W	7H	-2	200			-3	3
31 GRANT Team	13 TISLEVOLL Team	2NT W	7H	-2	200			7	-7
1 Wiggins Team	19 YANAGISAWA Team	2 E	AH	-2	200			8	-8
20 STRETTON Team	29 ASHWELL Team	2 E	AH	-1	100			4	-4
21 CORMACK Team	28 CARTER Team	2 E	AH	-1	100			7	-7
7 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	17 CAMP Team	3X E	AH	-1	200			7	-7
34 O'CONNOR Team	18 MORRIS Team	3X E	AH	-2	500			8	-8
32 CHANG Team	33 HAJMASI Team	3 E	AS	=		110		12	-12
22 LEI Team	3 CARSON Team	3 W	QH	=		110		-14	14

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NTX by EW	-3	800	1
3NTX by EW	-3	800	2
3X by EW	-2	500	1
2NT by EW	-3	300	1
3NT by EW	-3	300	1
2 by EW	-2	200	1
2NT by EW	-2	200	1
1NT by EW	-2	200	2
3X by EW	-1	200	2
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by EW	-1	100	3
1NT by EW	-1	100	1
2NT by EW	-1	100	1
3 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by NS	-1	-50	2
1NT by EW	=	-90	2
3 by NS	-2	-100	2
3 by EW	=	-110	1
3 by EW	=	-110	1
4 by NS	-3	-150	1
2 by NS	-3	-150	1
4 by NS	-3	-150	1
4 by NS	-4	-200	2
2X by NS	-2	-300	1
4NTX by NS	-4	-800	1

Alternative display format