Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
28 Gyde Team	10 Wood Team	3X W	QC	-2	500			12	-12
1 Crichton Team	19 Brewer Team	3 W	2S	-2	200			7	-7
15 De Luca Team	33 Gordon Team	2X W	9D	-1	200			7	-7
2 Collins Team	20 Dick Team	3 S	4D	+1	130			12	-12
35 McArthur Team	17 Clark Team	3 N	KS	=	110			14	-14
29 Sim Team	11 Yeomans Team	3 N	KS	=	110			7	-7
8 Tislevoll Team	26 Gray Team	3 N	KS	=	110			6	-6
22 Jackson Team	4 Smith Team	3 S	3D	=	110			5	-5
36 Butler Team	18 Hutton Team	3 W	9D	-1	100			5	-5
27 Ball Team	9 Campbell Team	2 W	4C	-1	100			7	-7
7 Hayward Team	25 Sutton Team	3 W	QC	-1	100			12	-12
12 Cartner Team	30 Kiss Team	1NT S	3S	=	90			5	-5
4 Smith Team	22 Jackson Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		-5	5
34 Skousgaard Team	16 McAllister Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		0	0
33 Gordon Team	15 De Luca Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		-7	7
16 McAllister Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		0	0
32 Brookes Team	14 Melville Team	3 S	AS	-1		100		0	0
18 Hutton Team	36 Butler Team	3 N	QS	-1		100		-5	5
19 Brewer Team	1 Crichton Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		-7	7
30 Kiss Team	12 Cartner Team	4 N	KS	-1		100		-5	5
5 Brown Team	23 Moore Team	3 S	3D	-1		100		3	-3
24 Duncan Team	6 Healy Team	2 W	9D	=		110		0	0
6 Healy Team	24 Duncan Team	1 W	9D	+1		110		0	0
26 Gray Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 W	8H	+1		110		-6	6
10 Wood Team	28 Gyde Team	2 W	2H	=		110		-12	12
14 Melville Team	32 Brookes Team	3 W	QC	=		110		0	0
13 Fermor Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	2 W	QC	=		110		5	-5
11 Yeomans Team	29 Sim Team	5 N	KS	-2		200		-7	7
23 Moore Team	5 Brown Team	4 N	KS	-2		200		-3	3
9 Campbell Team	27 Ball Team	3 N	KS	-2		200		-7	7
31 Jurgeleit Team	13 Fermor Team	3 N	2S	-3		300		-5	5
3 Janisz Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 S	KS	-3		300		3	-3
21 McFadyen Team	3 Janisz Team	3 N	KS	-4		400		-3	3
25 Sutton Team	7 Hayward Team	5X S	AS	-2		500		-12	12
20 Dick Team	2 Collins Team	5 S	5C	-5		500		-12	12
17 Clark Team	35 McArthur Team	3X W	QC	+1		930		-14	14

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 4
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3X by EW	-2	500	1
3 by EW	-2	200	1
2X by EW	-1	200	1
3 by NS	+1	130	1
3 by NS	=	110	3
3 by NS	=	110	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	-1	100	2
1NT by NS	=	90	1
4 by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	5
3 by NS	-1	-100	2
2 by EW	=	-110	3
3 by EW	=	-110	1
2 by EW	+1	-110	1
1 by EW	+1	-110	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
4 by NS	-2	-200	1
4 by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-4	-400	1
5 by NS	-5	-500	1
5X by NS	-2	-500	1
3X by EW	+1	-930	1

Alternative display format