Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
19 Brewer Team	1 Crichton Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		-7	7
20 Dick Team	2 Collins Team	5 S	5C	-5		500		-12	12
21 McFadyen Team	3 Janisz Team	3 N	KS	-4		400		-3	3
22 Jackson Team	4 Smith Team	3 S	3D	=	110			5	-5
23 Moore Team	5 Brown Team	4 N	KS	-2		200		-3	3
24 Duncan Team	6 Healy Team	2 W	9D	=		110		0	0
25 Sutton Team	7 Hayward Team	5X S	AS	-2		500		-12	12
26 Gray Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 W	8H	+1		110		-6	6
27 Ball Team	9 Campbell Team	2 W	4C	-1	100			7	-7
28 Gyde Team	10 Wood Team	3X W	QC	-2	500			12	-12
29 Sim Team	11 Yeomans Team	3 N	KS	=	110			7	-7
30 Kiss Team	12 Cartner Team	4 N	KS	-1		100		-5	5
31 Jurgeleit Team	13 Fermor Team	3 N	2S	-3		300		-5	5
32 Brookes Team	14 Melville Team	3 S	AS	-1		100		0	0
33 Gordon Team	15 De Luca Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		-7	7
34 Skousgaard Team	16 McAllister Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		0	0
35 McArthur Team	17 Clark Team	3 N	KS	=	110			14	-14
36 Butler Team	18 Hutton Team	3 W	9D	-1	100			5	-5
1 Crichton Team	19 Brewer Team	3 W	2S	-2	200			7	-7
2 Collins Team	20 Dick Team	3 S	4D	+1	130			12	-12
3 Janisz Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 S	KS	-3		300		3	-3
4 Smith Team	22 Jackson Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		-5	5
5 Brown Team	23 Moore Team	3 S	3D	-1		100		3	-3
6 Healy Team	24 Duncan Team	1 W	9D	+1		110		0	0
7 Hayward Team	25 Sutton Team	3 W	QC	-1	100			12	-12
8 Tislevoll Team	26 Gray Team	3 N	KS	=	110			6	-6
9 Campbell Team	27 Ball Team	3 N	KS	-2		200		-7	7
10 Wood Team	28 Gyde Team	2 W	2H	=		110		-12	12
11 Yeomans Team	29 Sim Team	5 N	KS	-2		200		-7	7
12 Cartner Team	30 Kiss Team	1NT S	3S	=	90			5	-5
13 Fermor Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	2 W	QC	=		110		5	-5
14 Melville Team	32 Brookes Team	3 W	QC	=		110		0	0
15 De Luca Team	33 Gordon Team	2X W	9D	-1	200			7	-7
16 McAllister Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3 N	KS	-1		100		0	0
17 Clark Team	35 McArthur Team	3X W	QC	+1		930		-14	14
18 Hutton Team	36 Butler Team	3 N	QS	-1		100		-5	5

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 4
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3X by EW	-2	500	1
3 by EW	-2	200	1
2X by EW	-1	200	1
3 by NS	+1	130	1
3 by NS	=	110	3
3 by NS	=	110	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	-1	100	2
1NT by NS	=	90	1
4 by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	5
3 by NS	-1	-100	2
2 by EW	=	-110	3
3 by EW	=	-110	1
2 by EW	+1	-110	1
1 by EW	+1	-110	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
4 by NS	-2	-200	1
4 by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-4	-400	1
5 by NS	-5	-500	1
5X by NS	-2	-500	1
3X by EW	+1	-930	1

Alternative display format