 |
Back to Main Results Index |
 |
NZ TEAMS ROUND OF 16 - MATCH 3
Board No: 30
Dealer: E, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: -60
| Teams | Score | Imps | ||||||||
| North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | Result | NS | EW | NS | EW | ||
| 5 SEBESFI Team | 6 SOMERVILLE Team | 3 W | KS | -4 | 200 | 7 | -7 | |||
| 8 SKIPPER Team | 7 JOHNSTON Team | 3 W | KS | -1 | 50 | 5 | -5 | |||
| 2 MORRISON Team | 1 BACH Team | 3 W | KS | -1 | 50 | 4 | -4 | |||
| 4 MULLEY Team | 3 BATCHELOR Team | 3 E | 4S | -4 | 200 | 4 | -4 | |||
| 11 GROSVENOR Team | 12 JARVIS Team | 3 N | QD | -1 | 50 | 3 | -3 | |||
| 9 RAGNARSSON Team | 10 GROVER Team | 2 N | 9H | -1 | 50 | 2 | -2 | |||
| 14 BOUGHEY Team | 13 FAN Team | 2NT W | 5S | = | 120 | 1 | -1 | |||
| 16 DELMONTE Team | 15 FISHER Team | 2 N | TS | -2 | 100 | 1 | -1 | |||
| 13 FAN Team | 14 BOUGHEY Team | 2 S | TS | -3 | 150 | -1 | 1 | |||
| 15 FISHER Team | 16 DELMONTE Team | 2NT W | 3D | = | 120 | -1 | 1 | |||
| 10 GROVER Team | 9 RAGNARSSON Team | 2 N | TS | -2 | 100 | -2 | 2 | |||
| 12 JARVIS Team | 11 GROSVENOR Team | 3 N | 2C | -3 | 150 | -3 | 3 | |||
| 1 BACH Team | 2 MORRISON Team | 2 N | QD | -2 | 100 | -4 | 4 | |||
| 3 BATCHELOR Team | 4 MULLEY Team | 4 E | 4S | -1 | 50 | -4 | 4 | |||
| 7 JOHNSTON Team | 8 SKIPPER Team | 2 N | TS | -3 | 150 | -5 | 5 | |||
| 6 SOMERVILLE Team | 5 SEBESFI Team | 1NT W | 6S | = | 90 | -7 | 7 | |||
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 30 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 3 by EW | -4 | 200 | 1 |
| 3 by EW | -4 | 200 | 1 |
| 3 by EW | -1 | 50 | 2 |
| 4 by EW | -1 | 50 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | = | -90 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | -2 | -100 | 3 |
| 2NT by EW | = | -120 | 2 |
| 2 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |