Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
2 WEHIPEIHANA	3 LIVINGSTON	2 N	6D	-2		100		-5	5
6 EDGINTON	12 WARE	3 W	7C	-2	200			3	-3
13 BURROWS	5 HUMPHREY	3 S	7H	-3		150		-6	6
4 LENNON	1 FISHER	1 E	9S	+2		140		0	0
1 FISHER	4 LENNON	2 E	AC	+1		140		0	0
5 HUMPHREY	13 BURROWS	4 E	AC	-1	100			6	-6
11 HODGE	7 ZHANG	2 E	AC	+1		140		1	-1
12 WARE	6 EDGINTON	4 E	AC	-1	100			-3	3
14 WIGGINS	9 TUMILOWICZ	2 E	AC	+1		140		-1	1
3 LIVINGSTON	2 WEHIPEIHANA	1 S	AD	+1	110			5	-5
8 WHYTE	10 MIAO	2 W	AS	-2	200			8	-8
7 ZHANG	11 HODGE	2 E	KC	+2		170		-1	1
9 TUMILOWICZ	14 WIGGINS	2 E	KC	=		110		1	-1
10 MIAO	8 WHYTE	2 S	QC	-3		150		-8	8

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

BOARD 3
BD: 3	A43	Dlr: S
	KT84	Vul: EW
	Q42
	743
QJ6		KT7
762		AQJ93
AJ983		6
Q9		JT52
	9852
	5
	KT75
	AK86
NT N - - - - -     9   S - - - - -   10   11 E 1 1 3 1 2     10   W 1 1 3 1 2

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 3
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-2	200	1
2 by EW	-2	200	1
1 by NS	+1	110	1
4 by EW	-1	100	2
2 by NS	-2	-100	1
2 by EW	=	-110	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	3
1 by EW	+2	-140	1
2 by NS	-3	-150	1
3 by NS	-3	-150	1
2 by EW	+2	-170	1

Alternative display format