Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 24
Dealer: W, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: 80

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 2NT N 4H = 120 6 -6

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 3 N 3D = 140 5 -5

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 1NT N 4H = 90 4 -4

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 3 N AH = 110 4 -4

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 W KC -1 50 3 -3

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 2NT N 2D +1 150 3 -3

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 2 -2

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 3 N AH = 110 1 -1

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 2NT N 4H = 120 1 -1

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 2NT N 8C = 120 1 -1

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 3 N AH = 110 1 -1

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 1NT S 8H = 90 0 0

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 3 N AH = 110 0 0

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 0 0

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 2 N AH = 110 0 0

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 2 N 2D = 90 0 0

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 0 0

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 1NT N 4H = 90 -1 1

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 1NT N 4H = 90 -1 1

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 1NT S 3H = 90 -1 1

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 3 W KC -2 100 -1 1

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 3 W KC -1 50 -2 2

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 3 W AC -1 50 -3 3

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 2NT N 3D -1 50 -3 3

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 2 S TH -1 50 -4 4

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 2NT N 2D -1 50 -4 4

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 2NT N 2D -1 50 -5 5

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 2 W AC = 110 -6 6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24
Contract Result Score Frequency
2NT by NS +1 150 1
3 by NS = 140 1
2NT by NS = 120 3
1NT by NS +1 120 3
3 by NS = 110 4
2 by NS = 110 1
3 by EW -2 100 1
2 by NS = 90 1
1NT by NS = 90 3
1NT by NS = 90 2
3 by EW -1 50 3
2NT by NS -1 -50 3
2 by NS -1 -50 1
2 by EW = -110 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	2NT N	4H	=	120		6	-6
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	3 N	3D	=	140		5	-5
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		4	-4
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	3 N	AH	=	110		4	-4
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 W	KC	-1	50		3	-3
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	2NT N	2D	+1	150		3	-3
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		2	-2
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	3 N	AH	=	110		1	-1
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	2NT N	4H	=	120		1	-1
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	2NT N	8C	=	120		1	-1
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	3 N	AH	=	110		1	-1
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	1NT S	8H	=	90		0	0
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	3 N	AH	=	110		0	0
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		0	0
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	2 N	AH	=	110		0	0
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	2 N	2D	=	90		0	0
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		0	0
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		-1	1
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		-1	1
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	1NT S	3H	=	90		-1	1
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	3 W	KC	-2	100		-1	1
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	3 W	KC	-1	50		-2	2
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	3 W	AC	-1	50		-3	3
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	2NT N	3D	-1		50	-3	3
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	2 S	TH	-1		50	-4	4
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	2NT N	2D	-1		50	-4	4
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	2NT N	2D	-1		50	-5	5
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	2 W	AC	=		110	-6	6

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NT by NS	+1	150	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2NT by NS	=	120	3
1NT by NS	+1	120	3
3 by NS	=	110	4
2 by NS	=	110	1
3 by EW	-2	100	1
2 by NS	=	90	1
1NT by NS	=	90	3
1NT by NS	=	90	2
3 by EW	-1	50	3
2NT by NS	-1	-50	3
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	1