Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 24
Dealer: W, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: 80

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 2NT N 2D +1 150 3 -3

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 2NT N 2D -1 50 -4 4

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 2 N 2D = 90 0 0

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 2NT N 2D -1 50 -5 5

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 2NT N 3D -1 50 -3 3

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 3 N 3D = 140 5 -5

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 1NT S 3H = 90 -1 1

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 1NT N 4H = 90 4 -4

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 1NT N 4H = 90 -1 1

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 2 -2

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 0 0

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 1NT N 4H = 90 -1 1

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 0 0

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 2NT N 4H = 120 1 -1

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 2NT N 4H = 120 6 -6

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 2NT N 8C = 120 1 -1

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 1NT S 8H = 90 0 0

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 2 W AC = 110 -6 6

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 3 W AC -1 50 -3 3

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 2 N AH = 110 0 0

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 3 N AH = 110 0 0

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 3 N AH = 110 1 -1

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 3 N AH = 110 4 -4

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 3 N AH = 110 1 -1

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 W KC -1 50 3 -3

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 3 W KC -1 50 -2 2

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 3 W KC -2 100 -1 1

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 2 S TH -1 50 -4 4

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24
Contract Result Score Frequency
2NT by NS +1 150 1
3 by NS = 140 1
2NT by NS = 120 3
1NT by NS +1 120 3
3 by NS = 110 4
2 by NS = 110 1
3 by EW -2 100 1
2 by NS = 90 1
1NT by NS = 90 3
1NT by NS = 90 2
3 by EW -1 50 3
2NT by NS -1 -50 3
2 by NS -1 -50 1
2 by EW = -110 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	2NT N	2D	+1	150		3	-3
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	2NT N	2D	-1		50	-4	4
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	2 N	2D	=	90		0	0
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	2NT N	2D	-1		50	-5	5
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	2NT N	3D	-1		50	-3	3
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	3 N	3D	=	140		5	-5
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	1NT S	3H	=	90		-1	1
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		4	-4
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		-1	1
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		2	-2
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		0	0
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		-1	1
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		0	0
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	2NT N	4H	=	120		1	-1
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	2NT N	4H	=	120		6	-6
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	2NT N	8C	=	120		1	-1
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	1NT S	8H	=	90		0	0
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	2 W	AC	=		110	-6	6
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	3 W	AC	-1	50		-3	3
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	2 N	AH	=	110		0	0
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	3 N	AH	=	110		0	0
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	3 N	AH	=	110		1	-1
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	3 N	AH	=	110		4	-4
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	3 N	AH	=	110		1	-1
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 W	KC	-1	50		3	-3
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	3 W	KC	-1	50		-2	2
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	3 W	KC	-2	100		-1	1
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	2 S	TH	-1		50	-4	4

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NT by NS	+1	150	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2NT by NS	=	120	3
1NT by NS	+1	120	3
3 by NS	=	110	4
2 by NS	=	110	1
3 by EW	-2	100	1
2 by NS	=	90	1
1NT by NS	=	90	3
1NT by NS	=	90	2
3 by EW	-1	50	3
2NT by NS	-1	-50	3
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	1