Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 24
Dealer: W, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: 80

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 3 W KC -2 100 -1 1

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 3 W AC -1 50 -3 3

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 3 W KC -1 50 -2 2

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 2NT N 4H = 120 6 -6

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 2NT N 2D -1 50 -4 4

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 2 N 2D = 90 0 0

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 2NT N 3D -1 50 -3 3

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 2 S TH -1 50 -4 4

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 0 0

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 2NT N 2D -1 50 -5 5

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 1NT N 4H = 90 -1 1

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 3 N AH = 110 1 -1

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 2 -2

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 3 N AH = 110 0 0

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 2NT N 2D +1 150 3 -3

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 1NT N 4H = 90 -1 1

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 1NT S 3H = 90 -1 1

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 2 N AH = 110 0 0

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 2NT N 8C = 120 1 -1

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 3 N 3D = 140 5 -5

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 1NT N 4H +1 120 0 0

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 2NT N 4H = 120 1 -1

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3 W KC -1 50 3 -3

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 1NT S 8H = 90 0 0

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 3 N AH = 110 4 -4

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 1NT N 4H = 90 4 -4

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 3 N AH = 110 1 -1

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 2 W AC = 110 -6 6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24
Contract Result Score Frequency
2NT by NS +1 150 1
3 by NS = 140 1
2NT by NS = 120 3
1NT by NS +1 120 3
3 by NS = 110 4
2 by NS = 110 1
3 by EW -2 100 1
2 by NS = 90 1
1NT by NS = 90 3
1NT by NS = 90 2
3 by EW -1 50 3
2NT by NS -1 -50 3
2 by NS -1 -50 1
2 by EW = -110 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	3 W	KC	-2	100		-1	1
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	3 W	AC	-1	50		-3	3
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	3 W	KC	-1	50		-2	2
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	2NT N	4H	=	120		6	-6
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	2NT N	2D	-1		50	-4	4
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	2 N	2D	=	90		0	0
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	2NT N	3D	-1		50	-3	3
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	2 S	TH	-1		50	-4	4
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		0	0
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	2NT N	2D	-1		50	-5	5
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		-1	1
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	3 N	AH	=	110		1	-1
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		2	-2
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	3 N	AH	=	110		0	0
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	2NT N	2D	+1	150		3	-3
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		-1	1
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	1NT S	3H	=	90		-1	1
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	2 N	AH	=	110		0	0
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	2NT N	8C	=	120		1	-1
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	3 N	3D	=	140		5	-5
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	1NT N	4H	+1	120		0	0
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	2NT N	4H	=	120		1	-1
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3 W	KC	-1	50		3	-3
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	1NT S	8H	=	90		0	0
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	3 N	AH	=	110		4	-4
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	1NT N	4H	=	90		4	-4
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	3 N	AH	=	110		1	-1
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	2 W	AC	=		110	-6	6

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NT by NS	+1	150	1
3 by NS	=	140	1
2NT by NS	=	120	3
1NT by NS	+1	120	3
3 by NS	=	110	4
2 by NS	=	110	1
3 by EW	-2	100	1
2 by NS	=	90	1
1NT by NS	=	90	3
1NT by NS	=	90	2
3 by EW	-1	50	3
2NT by NS	-1	-50	3
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	1