Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 22
Dealer: E, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -610

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 3NT E 4H +1 630 -10 10

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 3NT W QD +2 660 -2 2

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 3NT E 3H +1 630 -1 1

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 3NT W KD +1 630 -1 1

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 4 W 8C = 620 -1 1

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 3NT E 4H +1 630 -1 1

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 4 W 8C = 620 -1 1

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 3NT E QH = 600 0 0

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 3NT E 6H = 600 0 0

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 3NT W 3H = 600 0 0

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 3NT W 9S +1 630 0 0

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 3NT E 4H = 600 0 0

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 3NT E 4H = 600 0 0

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 3NT E 4H = 600 0 0

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 3NT E 6H = 600 0 0

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 3NT E 4H = 600 0 0

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 3NT W 8S +1 630 0 0

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 3NT E 4H = 600 0 0

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 3NT E 4H = 600 0 0

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 3NT E 4H = 600 0 0

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 3NT E 4H = 600 0 0

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 3NT E QH = 600 1 -1

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 3NT E 4H = 600 1 -1

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 3NT E 4H = 600 1 -1

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 3NT W 3H = 600 1 -1

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 3NT W 3H = 600 1 -1

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 3NT E 4H = 600 2 -2

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 2NT W 5H +2 180 10 -10

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22
Contract Result Score Frequency
2NT by EW +2 -180 1
3NT by EW = -600 15
3NT by EW = -600 3
4 by EW = -620 2
3NT by EW +1 -630 3
3NT by EW +1 -630 3
3NT by EW +2 -660 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	3NT E	4H	+1		630	-10	10
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	3NT W	QD	+2		660	-2	2
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	3NT E	3H	+1		630	-1	1
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	3NT W	KD	+1		630	-1	1
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	4 W	8C	=		620	-1	1
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	3NT E	4H	+1		630	-1	1
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	4 W	8C	=		620	-1	1
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	3NT E	QH	=		600	0	0
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	0	0
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	3NT W	3H	=		600	0	0
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	3NT W	9S	+1		630	0	0
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	0	0
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	0	0
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	0	0
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	3NT E	6H	=		600	0	0
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	0	0
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	3NT W	8S	+1		630	0	0
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	0	0
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	0	0
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	0	0
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	0	0
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	3NT E	QH	=		600	1	-1
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	1	-1
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	1	-1
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	3NT W	3H	=		600	1	-1
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	3NT W	3H	=		600	1	-1
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	3NT E	4H	=		600	2	-2
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	2NT W	5H	+2		180	10	-10

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2NT by EW	+2	-180	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	15
3NT by EW	=	-600	3
4 by EW	=	-620	2
3NT by EW	+1	-630	3
3NT by EW	+1	-630	3
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1