Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 21
Dealer: N, Vul: NS, Room Datum: -660

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 4X S AS -4 1100 -3 3

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 6 E 4D = 980 -11 11

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 6 E AC = 980 -11 11

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 6 W AC = 980 -11 11

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 6 W AD = 980 -11 11

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 6 E TS = 980 0 0

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 6 W AC = 980 -11 11

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 6 W AD = 980 -11 11

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 6 W AD = 980 3 -3

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 6 W AD = 980 0 0

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 6 E 6H = 980 -11 11

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 5 E 4D +1 480 -1 1

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 5 E 7D +1 480 11 -11

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 4 E 6H +2 480 -1 1

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 4 E 6H +2 480 0 0

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 5 E 6H +1 480 11 -11

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 5 E 9H +1 480 -1 1

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 4 E 4D +2 480 0 0

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 4 W AC +2 480 11 -11

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 4 W TH +2 480 11 -11

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 4 E 9C +2 480 11 -11

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 4 E 4D +2 480 -1 1

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 4 E 7D +2 480 11 -11

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 4 E 7D +1 450 11 -11

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 4 W AD +1 450 1 -1

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 5 W AC = 450 1 -1

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 4 W AD +1 450 1 -1

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 4 E 4D +1 450 1 -1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 21
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by EW = -450 1
4 by EW +1 -450 2
4 by EW +1 -450 2
5 by EW +1 -480 4
4 by EW +2 -480 6
4 by EW +2 -480 2
6 by EW = -980 4
6 by EW = -980 6
4X by NS -4 -1100 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	4X S	AS	-4		1100	-3	3
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	6 E	4D	=		980	-11	11
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	6 E	AC	=		980	-11	11
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	6 W	AC	=		980	-11	11
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	6 W	AD	=		980	-11	11
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	6 E	TS	=		980	0	0
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	6 W	AC	=		980	-11	11
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	6 W	AD	=		980	-11	11
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	6 W	AD	=		980	3	-3
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	6 W	AD	=		980	0	0
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	6 E	6H	=		980	-11	11
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	5 E	4D	+1		480	-1	1
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	5 E	7D	+1		480	11	-11
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	4 E	6H	+2		480	-1	1
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	4 E	6H	+2		480	0	0
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	5 E	6H	+1		480	11	-11
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	5 E	9H	+1		480	-1	1
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	4 E	4D	+2		480	0	0
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	4 W	AC	+2		480	11	-11
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	4 W	TH	+2		480	11	-11
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 E	9C	+2		480	11	-11
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 E	4D	+2		480	-1	1
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	4 E	7D	+2		480	11	-11
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	4 E	7D	+1		450	11	-11
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	4 W	AD	+1		450	1	-1
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	5 W	AC	=		450	1	-1
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	4 W	AD	+1		450	1	-1
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	4 E	4D	+1		450	1	-1

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 21
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	=	-450	1
4 by EW	+1	-450	2
4 by EW	+1	-450	2
5 by EW	+1	-480	4
4 by EW	+2	-480	6
4 by EW	+2	-480	2
6 by EW	=	-980	4
6 by EW	=	-980	6
4X by NS	-4	-1100	1