Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 21
Dealer: N, Vul: NS, Room Datum: -660

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 4 E 7D +1 450 11 -11

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 6 E 4D = 980 -11 11

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 4 E 9C +2 480 11 -11

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 4 W TH +2 480 11 -11

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 6 E 6H = 980 -11 11

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 5 E 9H +1 480 -1 1

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 4 E 4D +1 450 1 -1

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 4 E 6H +2 480 -1 1

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 5 E 7D +1 480 11 -11

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 6 W AD = 980 0 0

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 5 E 4D +1 480 -1 1

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 6 W AD = 980 3 -3

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 6 W AD = 980 -11 11

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 4 E 6H +2 480 0 0

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 5 E 6H +1 480 11 -11

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 4X S AS -4 1100 -3 3

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 6 W AC = 980 -11 11

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 4 E 4D +2 480 0 0

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 4 W AD +1 450 1 -1

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 6 E TS = 980 0 0

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 6 W AD = 980 -11 11

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 6 W AC = 980 -11 11

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 4 E 4D +2 480 -1 1

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 5 W AC = 450 1 -1

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 4 E 7D +2 480 11 -11

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 4 W AD +1 450 1 -1

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 4 W AC +2 480 11 -11

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 6 E AC = 980 -11 11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 21
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by EW = -450 1
4 by EW +1 -450 2
4 by EW +1 -450 2
5 by EW +1 -480 4
4 by EW +2 -480 6
4 by EW +2 -480 2
6 by EW = -980 4
6 by EW = -980 6
4X by NS -4 -1100 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	4 E	7D	+1		450	11	-11
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	6 E	4D	=		980	-11	11
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	4 E	9C	+2		480	11	-11
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	4 W	TH	+2		480	11	-11
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	6 E	6H	=		980	-11	11
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	5 E	9H	+1		480	-1	1
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	4 E	4D	+1		450	1	-1
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	4 E	6H	+2		480	-1	1
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	5 E	7D	+1		480	11	-11
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	6 W	AD	=		980	0	0
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	5 E	4D	+1		480	-1	1
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	6 W	AD	=		980	3	-3
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	6 W	AD	=		980	-11	11
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	4 E	6H	+2		480	0	0
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	5 E	6H	+1		480	11	-11
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	4X S	AS	-4		1100	-3	3
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	6 W	AC	=		980	-11	11
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	4 E	4D	+2		480	0	0
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	4 W	AD	+1		450	1	-1
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	6 E	TS	=		980	0	0
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	6 W	AD	=		980	-11	11
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	6 W	AC	=		980	-11	11
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	4 E	4D	+2		480	-1	1
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	5 W	AC	=		450	1	-1
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	4 E	7D	+2		480	11	-11
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	4 W	AD	+1		450	1	-1
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	4 W	AC	+2		480	11	-11
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	6 E	AC	=		980	-11	11

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 21
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	=	-450	1
4 by EW	+1	-450	2
4 by EW	+1	-450	2
5 by EW	+1	-480	4
4 by EW	+2	-480	6
4 by EW	+2	-480	2
6 by EW	=	-980	4
6 by EW	=	-980	6
4X by NS	-4	-1100	1