Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 20
Dealer: W, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 40

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 1 S 6D = 80 5 -5

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 1NT N 5S = 90 -1 1

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 1NT N 5S +2 150 2 -2

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 1NT N 5S = 90 0 0

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 1NT N 5S = 90 0 0

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 1NT N 4S +1 120 1 -1

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 1NT N 5S = 90 0 0

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 1NT N 4S = 90 -9 9

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 1NT N TH +1 120 -1 1

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 1NT N 5S = 90 7 -7

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 1NT N 5S = 90 -1 1

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 1NT N 9C +1 120 1 -1

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 1NT N 5S +2 150 1 -1

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 1NT N 5S -2 200 -3 3

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 1NT N 4S -1 100 -5 5

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 1NT N 6S = 90 0 0

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 1NT N 4S = 90 0 0

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 1NT S KH -2 200 -7 7

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 2 S 6S -2 200 -7 7

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 2NT N 5S -1 100 5 -5

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 2NT N 5S -1 100 3 -3

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 2 E QS -1 100 7 -7

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 2 E 4C -1 100 -2 2

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 2 W AC -1 100 0 0

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 2X E 4C -2 500 9 -9

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 3 N 3D -2 200 -14 14

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 3 N TH -3 300 -5 5

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 3X E 4C -3 800 14 -14

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 20
Contract Result Score Frequency
3X by EW -3 800 1
2X by EW -2 500 1
1NT by NS +2 150 2
1NT by NS +1 120 3
2 by EW -1 100 2
2 by EW -1 100 1
1NT by NS = 90 9
1 by NS = 80 1
2NT by NS -1 -100 2
1NT by NS -1 -100 1
1NT by NS -2 -200 1
2 by NS -2 -200 1
3 by NS -2 -200 1
1NT by NS -2 -200 1
3 by NS -3 -300 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	1 S	6D	=	80		5	-5
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		-1	1
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	1NT N	5S	+2	150		2	-2
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		0	0
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		0	0
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	1NT N	4S	+1	120		1	-1
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		0	0
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	1NT N	4S	=	90		-9	9
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	1NT N	TH	+1	120		-1	1
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		7	-7
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		-1	1
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	1NT N	9C	+1	120		1	-1
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	1NT N	5S	+2	150		1	-1
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	1NT N	5S	-2		200	-3	3
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	1NT N	4S	-1		100	-5	5
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	1NT N	6S	=	90		0	0
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	1NT N	4S	=	90		0	0
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	1NT S	KH	-2		200	-7	7
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	2 S	6S	-2		200	-7	7
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	2NT N	5S	-1		100	5	-5
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	2NT N	5S	-1		100	3	-3
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	2 E	QS	-1	100		7	-7
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	2 E	4C	-1	100		-2	2
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	2 W	AC	-1	100		0	0
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	2X E	4C	-2	500		9	-9
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	3 N	3D	-2		200	-14	14
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	3 N	TH	-3		300	-5	5
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	3X E	4C	-3	800		14	-14

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 20
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3X by EW	-3	800	1
2X by EW	-2	500	1
1NT by NS	+2	150	2
1NT by NS	+1	120	3
2 by EW	-1	100	2
2 by EW	-1	100	1
1NT by NS	=	90	9
1 by NS	=	80	1
2NT by NS	-1	-100	2
1NT by NS	-1	-100	1
1NT by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
1NT by NS	-2	-200	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1