Boards Results

NATIONAL 15A TEAMS - MATCH 2

Board No: 20
Dealer: W, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 40

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Result   NS     EW      NS EW

1 Yule Team 22 Foidl Team 2 E QS -1 100 7 -7

2 Turner Team 15 Curnow Team 1NT N 9C +1 120 1 -1

3 Buzzard Team 13 Bartoli Team 1NT N 5S +2 150 1 -1

4 Pemberton Team 28 Lovell Team 2 E 4C -1 100 -2 2

5 van Wijngaarden Team 25 Richardson Team 1NT N 5S -2 200 -3 3

6 Malthus Team 24 Gordon Team 2NT N 5S -1 100 5 -5

7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 23 Roggeveen Team 1NT N 4S -1 100 -5 5

8 Robinson Team 26 Watson Team 2 W AC -1 100 0 0

9 Miao Team 21 Davies Team 1NT N 6S = 90 0 0

10 Tislevoll Team 20 Luoni Team 1NT N 5S = 90 -1 1

11 Johnstone Team 19 Young Team 1NT N 4S = 90 0 0

12 Grant Team 16 Monaghan Team 1NT N 5S = 90 7 -7

13 Bartoli Team 3 Buzzard Team 1NT N TH +1 120 -1 1

14 Dowling Team 18 Abraham Team 2X E 4C -2 500 9 -9

15 Curnow Team 2 Turner Team 1NT N 5S = 90 -1 1

16 Monaghan Team 12 Grant Team 2 S 6S -2 200 -7 7

17 Bott Team 27 Gray Team 3 N 3D -2 200 -14 14

18 Abraham Team 14 Dowling Team 1NT N 4S = 90 -9 9

19 Young Team 11 Johnstone Team 1NT N 5S = 90 0 0

20 Luoni Team 10 Tislevoll Team 1NT N 4S +1 120 1 -1

21 Davies Team 9 Miao Team 1NT N 5S = 90 0 0

22 Foidl Team 1 Yule Team 1NT S KH -2 200 -7 7

23 Roggeveen Team 7 Fraser-Hoskin Team 1 S 6D = 80 5 -5

24 Gordon Team 6 Malthus Team 3 N TH -3 300 -5 5

25 Richardson Team 5 van Wijngaarden Team 2NT N 5S -1 100 3 -3

26 Watson Team 8 Robinson Team 1NT N 5S = 90 0 0

27 Gray Team 17 Bott Team 3X E 4C -3 800 14 -14

28 Lovell Team 4 Pemberton Team 1NT N 5S +2 150 2 -2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 20
Contract Result Score Frequency
3X by EW -3 800 1
2X by EW -2 500 1
1NT by NS +2 150 2
1NT by NS +1 120 3
2 by EW -1 100 2
2 by EW -1 100 1
1NT by NS = 90 9
1 by NS = 80 1
2NT by NS -1 -100 2
1NT by NS -1 -100 1
1NT by NS -2 -200 1
2 by NS -2 -200 1
3 by NS -2 -200 1
1NT by NS -2 -200 1
3 by NS -3 -300 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 Yule Team	22 Foidl Team	2 E	QS	-1	100		7	-7
2 Turner Team	15 Curnow Team	1NT N	9C	+1	120		1	-1
3 Buzzard Team	13 Bartoli Team	1NT N	5S	+2	150		1	-1
4 Pemberton Team	28 Lovell Team	2 E	4C	-1	100		-2	2
5 van Wijngaarden Team	25 Richardson Team	1NT N	5S	-2		200	-3	3
6 Malthus Team	24 Gordon Team	2NT N	5S	-1		100	5	-5
7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	23 Roggeveen Team	1NT N	4S	-1		100	-5	5
8 Robinson Team	26 Watson Team	2 W	AC	-1	100		0	0
9 Miao Team	21 Davies Team	1NT N	6S	=	90		0	0
10 Tislevoll Team	20 Luoni Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		-1	1
11 Johnstone Team	19 Young Team	1NT N	4S	=	90		0	0
12 Grant Team	16 Monaghan Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		7	-7
13 Bartoli Team	3 Buzzard Team	1NT N	TH	+1	120		-1	1
14 Dowling Team	18 Abraham Team	2X E	4C	-2	500		9	-9
15 Curnow Team	2 Turner Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		-1	1
16 Monaghan Team	12 Grant Team	2 S	6S	-2		200	-7	7
17 Bott Team	27 Gray Team	3 N	3D	-2		200	-14	14
18 Abraham Team	14 Dowling Team	1NT N	4S	=	90		-9	9
19 Young Team	11 Johnstone Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		0	0
20 Luoni Team	10 Tislevoll Team	1NT N	4S	+1	120		1	-1
21 Davies Team	9 Miao Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		0	0
22 Foidl Team	1 Yule Team	1NT S	KH	-2		200	-7	7
23 Roggeveen Team	7 Fraser-Hoskin Team	1 S	6D	=	80		5	-5
24 Gordon Team	6 Malthus Team	3 N	TH	-3		300	-5	5
25 Richardson Team	5 van Wijngaarden Team	2NT N	5S	-1		100	3	-3
26 Watson Team	8 Robinson Team	1NT N	5S	=	90		0	0
27 Gray Team	17 Bott Team	3X E	4C	-3	800		14	-14
28 Lovell Team	4 Pemberton Team	1NT N	5S	+2	150		2	-2

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 20
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3X by EW	-3	800	1
2X by EW	-2	500	1
1NT by NS	+2	150	2
1NT by NS	+1	120	3
2 by EW	-1	100	2
2 by EW	-1	100	1
1NT by NS	=	90	9
1 by NS	=	80	1
2NT by NS	-1	-100	2
1NT by NS	-1	-100	1
1NT by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
1NT by NS	-2	-200	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1