Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
3 Janisz Team	25 Sutton Team	1X N	AC	-2		500		-11	11
24 Duncan Team	29 Sim Team	3NT S	5H	-5		500		-7	7
26 Gray Team	14 Melville Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
15 De Luca Team	22 Jackson Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
13 Fermor Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 S	AS	-4		400		-7	7
19 Brewer Team	20 Dick Team	2NT S	5H	-3		300		-8	8
36 Butler Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 N	AC	-3		300		-5	5
1 Crichton Team	23 Moore Team	3 S	9C	-3		300		-5	5
12 Cartner Team	17 Clark Team	2NT N	KH	-3		300		-8	8
6 Healy Team	7 Hayward Team	2 S	5C	-3		300		-5	5
10 Wood Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3NT S	2S	-3		300		-8	8
11 Yeomans Team	9 Campbell Team	1 N	TS	-2		200		-6	6
29 Sim Team	24 Duncan Team	2 S	9C	-2		200		7	-7
4 Smith Team	32 Brookes Team	2 N	AC	-2		200		-6	6
18 Hutton Team	5 Brown Team	3NT N	QD	-2		200		-6	6
33 Gordon Team	35 McArthur Team	1 E	JD	+2		140		-5	5
16 McAllister Team	28 Gyde Team	2 E	TD	+1		140		-1	1
22 Jackson Team	15 De Luca Team	3 E	7D	=		140		8	-8
23 Moore Team	1 Crichton Team	1 E	JD	+1		110		5	-5
28 Gyde Team	16 McAllister Team	2 W	AH	=		110		1	-1
27 Ball Team	2 Collins Team	2 E	JD	=		110		-4	4
21 McFadyen Team	13 Fermor Team	2 E	JD	=		110		7	-7
7 Hayward Team	6 Healy Team	2 E	JD	=		110		5	-5
14 Melville Team	26 Gray Team	2 E	JD	=		110		8	-8
8 Tislevoll Team	36 Butler Team	2 E	6H	=		110		5	-5
20 Dick Team	19 Brewer Team	3NT W	QS	-1	50			8	-8
5 Brown Team	18 Hutton Team	2 W	KS	-1	50			6	-6
25 Sutton Team	3 Janisz Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			11	-11
17 Clark Team	12 Cartner Team	3 W	KS	-1	50			8	-8
31 Jurgeleit Team	30 Kiss Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			-2	2
32 Brookes Team	4 Smith Team	2 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
9 Campbell Team	11 Yeomans Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
34 Skousgaard Team	10 Wood Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			8	-8
35 McArthur Team	33 Gordon Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			5	-5
2 Collins Team	27 Ball Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			4	-4
30 Kiss Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	3 E	2H	-2	100			2	-2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 12
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-2	100	1
3 by EW	-1	50	3
3 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	2
3 by EW	-1	50	1
3NT by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	5
2 by EW	=	-110	1
1 by EW	+1	-110	1
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
1 by EW	+2	-140	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
1 by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3NT by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
4 by NS	-4	-400	1
2X by EW	=	-470	2
3NT by NS	-5	-500	1
1X by NS	-2	-500	1

Alternative display format