Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
25 Sutton Team	3 Janisz Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			11	-11
34 Skousgaard Team	10 Wood Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			8	-8
22 Jackson Team	15 De Luca Team	3 E	7D	=		140		8	-8
20 Dick Team	19 Brewer Team	3NT W	QS	-1	50			8	-8
14 Melville Team	26 Gray Team	2 E	JD	=		110		8	-8
17 Clark Team	12 Cartner Team	3 W	KS	-1	50			8	-8
21 McFadyen Team	13 Fermor Team	2 E	JD	=		110		7	-7
29 Sim Team	24 Duncan Team	2 S	9C	-2		200		7	-7
5 Brown Team	18 Hutton Team	2 W	KS	-1	50			6	-6
9 Campbell Team	11 Yeomans Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
32 Brookes Team	4 Smith Team	2 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
23 Moore Team	1 Crichton Team	1 E	JD	+1		110		5	-5
35 McArthur Team	33 Gordon Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			5	-5
7 Hayward Team	6 Healy Team	2 E	JD	=		110		5	-5
8 Tislevoll Team	36 Butler Team	2 E	6H	=		110		5	-5
2 Collins Team	27 Ball Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			4	-4
30 Kiss Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	3 E	2H	-2	100			2	-2
28 Gyde Team	16 McAllister Team	2 W	AH	=		110		1	-1
16 McAllister Team	28 Gyde Team	2 E	TD	+1		140		-1	1
31 Jurgeleit Team	30 Kiss Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			-2	2
27 Ball Team	2 Collins Team	2 E	JD	=		110		-4	4
33 Gordon Team	35 McArthur Team	1 E	JD	+2		140		-5	5
1 Crichton Team	23 Moore Team	3 S	9C	-3		300		-5	5
36 Butler Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 N	AC	-3		300		-5	5
6 Healy Team	7 Hayward Team	2 S	5C	-3		300		-5	5
18 Hutton Team	5 Brown Team	3NT N	QD	-2		200		-6	6
11 Yeomans Team	9 Campbell Team	1 N	TS	-2		200		-6	6
4 Smith Team	32 Brookes Team	2 N	AC	-2		200		-6	6
24 Duncan Team	29 Sim Team	3NT S	5H	-5		500		-7	7
13 Fermor Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 S	AS	-4		400		-7	7
26 Gray Team	14 Melville Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
19 Brewer Team	20 Dick Team	2NT S	5H	-3		300		-8	8
15 De Luca Team	22 Jackson Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
12 Cartner Team	17 Clark Team	2NT N	KH	-3		300		-8	8
10 Wood Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3NT S	2S	-3		300		-8	8
3 Janisz Team	25 Sutton Team	1X N	AC	-2		500		-11	11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 12
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-2	100	1
3 by EW	-1	50	3
3 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	2
3 by EW	-1	50	1
3NT by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	5
2 by EW	=	-110	1
1 by EW	+1	-110	1
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
1 by EW	+2	-140	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
1 by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3NT by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
4 by NS	-4	-400	1
2X by EW	=	-470	2
3NT by NS	-5	-500	1
1X by NS	-2	-500	1

Alternative display format