Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
30 Kiss Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	3 E	2H	-2	100			2	-2
10 Wood Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3NT S	2S	-3		300		-8	8
6 Healy Team	7 Hayward Team	2 S	5C	-3		300		-5	5
24 Duncan Team	29 Sim Team	3NT S	5H	-5		500		-7	7
19 Brewer Team	20 Dick Team	2NT S	5H	-3		300		-8	8
8 Tislevoll Team	36 Butler Team	2 E	6H	=		110		5	-5
22 Jackson Team	15 De Luca Team	3 E	7D	=		140		8	-8
1 Crichton Team	23 Moore Team	3 S	9C	-3		300		-5	5
29 Sim Team	24 Duncan Team	2 S	9C	-2		200		7	-7
36 Butler Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 N	AC	-3		300		-5	5
3 Janisz Team	25 Sutton Team	1X N	AC	-2		500		-11	11
4 Smith Team	32 Brookes Team	2 N	AC	-2		200		-6	6
28 Gyde Team	16 McAllister Team	2 W	AH	=		110		1	-1
13 Fermor Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 S	AS	-4		400		-7	7
2 Collins Team	27 Ball Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			4	-4
14 Melville Team	26 Gray Team	2 E	JD	=		110		8	-8
34 Skousgaard Team	10 Wood Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			8	-8
33 Gordon Team	35 McArthur Team	1 E	JD	+2		140		-5	5
32 Brookes Team	4 Smith Team	2 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
9 Campbell Team	11 Yeomans Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
21 McFadyen Team	13 Fermor Team	2 E	JD	=		110		7	-7
7 Hayward Team	6 Healy Team	2 E	JD	=		110		5	-5
23 Moore Team	1 Crichton Team	1 E	JD	+1		110		5	-5
25 Sutton Team	3 Janisz Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			11	-11
27 Ball Team	2 Collins Team	2 E	JD	=		110		-4	4
12 Cartner Team	17 Clark Team	2NT N	KH	-3		300		-8	8
26 Gray Team	14 Melville Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
5 Brown Team	18 Hutton Team	2 W	KS	-1	50			6	-6
31 Jurgeleit Team	30 Kiss Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			-2	2
17 Clark Team	12 Cartner Team	3 W	KS	-1	50			8	-8
15 De Luca Team	22 Jackson Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
35 McArthur Team	33 Gordon Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			5	-5
18 Hutton Team	5 Brown Team	3NT N	QD	-2		200		-6	6
20 Dick Team	19 Brewer Team	3NT W	QS	-1	50			8	-8
16 McAllister Team	28 Gyde Team	2 E	TD	+1		140		-1	1
11 Yeomans Team	9 Campbell Team	1 N	TS	-2		200		-6	6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 12
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-2	100	1
3 by EW	-1	50	3
3 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	2
3 by EW	-1	50	1
3NT by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	5
2 by EW	=	-110	1
1 by EW	+1	-110	1
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
1 by EW	+2	-140	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
1 by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3NT by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
4 by NS	-4	-400	1
2X by EW	=	-470	2
3NT by NS	-5	-500	1
1X by NS	-2	-500	1

Alternative display format