Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
11 Yeomans Team	9 Campbell Team	1 N	TS	-2		200		-6	6
33 Gordon Team	35 McArthur Team	1 E	JD	+2		140		-5	5
23 Moore Team	1 Crichton Team	1 E	JD	+1		110		5	-5
3 Janisz Team	25 Sutton Team	1X N	AC	-2		500		-11	11
35 McArthur Team	33 Gordon Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			5	-5
31 Jurgeleit Team	30 Kiss Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			-2	2
36 Butler Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 N	AC	-3		300		-5	5
4 Smith Team	32 Brookes Team	2 N	AC	-2		200		-6	6
6 Healy Team	7 Hayward Team	2 S	5C	-3		300		-5	5
29 Sim Team	24 Duncan Team	2 S	9C	-2		200		7	-7
5 Brown Team	18 Hutton Team	2 W	KS	-1	50			6	-6
26 Gray Team	14 Melville Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
15 De Luca Team	22 Jackson Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
12 Cartner Team	17 Clark Team	2NT N	KH	-3		300		-8	8
19 Brewer Team	20 Dick Team	2NT S	5H	-3		300		-8	8
16 McAllister Team	28 Gyde Team	2 E	TD	+1		140		-1	1
7 Hayward Team	6 Healy Team	2 E	JD	=		110		5	-5
8 Tislevoll Team	36 Butler Team	2 E	6H	=		110		5	-5
21 McFadyen Team	13 Fermor Team	2 E	JD	=		110		7	-7
32 Brookes Team	4 Smith Team	2 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
14 Melville Team	26 Gray Team	2 E	JD	=		110		8	-8
27 Ball Team	2 Collins Team	2 E	JD	=		110		-4	4
28 Gyde Team	16 McAllister Team	2 W	AH	=		110		1	-1
2 Collins Team	27 Ball Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			4	-4
9 Campbell Team	11 Yeomans Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
25 Sutton Team	3 Janisz Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			11	-11
30 Kiss Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	3 E	2H	-2	100			2	-2
17 Clark Team	12 Cartner Team	3 W	KS	-1	50			8	-8
1 Crichton Team	23 Moore Team	3 S	9C	-3		300		-5	5
18 Hutton Team	5 Brown Team	3NT N	QD	-2		200		-6	6
10 Wood Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3NT S	2S	-3		300		-8	8
24 Duncan Team	29 Sim Team	3NT S	5H	-5		500		-7	7
20 Dick Team	19 Brewer Team	3NT W	QS	-1	50			8	-8
22 Jackson Team	15 De Luca Team	3 E	7D	=		140		8	-8
34 Skousgaard Team	10 Wood Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			8	-8
13 Fermor Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 S	AS	-4		400		-7	7

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 12
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-2	100	1
3 by EW	-1	50	3
3 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	2
3 by EW	-1	50	1
3NT by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	5
2 by EW	=	-110	1
1 by EW	+1	-110	1
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
1 by EW	+2	-140	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
1 by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3NT by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
4 by NS	-4	-400	1
2X by EW	=	-470	2
3NT by NS	-5	-500	1
1X by NS	-2	-500	1

Alternative display format