Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 Crichton Team	23 Moore Team	3 S	9C	-3		300		-5	5
2 Collins Team	27 Ball Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			4	-4
3 Janisz Team	25 Sutton Team	1X N	AC	-2		500		-11	11
4 Smith Team	32 Brookes Team	2 N	AC	-2		200		-6	6
5 Brown Team	18 Hutton Team	2 W	KS	-1	50			6	-6
6 Healy Team	7 Hayward Team	2 S	5C	-3		300		-5	5
7 Hayward Team	6 Healy Team	2 E	JD	=		110		5	-5
8 Tislevoll Team	36 Butler Team	2 E	6H	=		110		5	-5
9 Campbell Team	11 Yeomans Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
10 Wood Team	34 Skousgaard Team	3NT S	2S	-3		300		-8	8
11 Yeomans Team	9 Campbell Team	1 N	TS	-2		200		-6	6
12 Cartner Team	17 Clark Team	2NT N	KH	-3		300		-8	8
13 Fermor Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 S	AS	-4		400		-7	7
14 Melville Team	26 Gray Team	2 E	JD	=		110		8	-8
15 De Luca Team	22 Jackson Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
16 McAllister Team	28 Gyde Team	2 E	TD	+1		140		-1	1
17 Clark Team	12 Cartner Team	3 W	KS	-1	50			8	-8
18 Hutton Team	5 Brown Team	3NT N	QD	-2		200		-6	6
19 Brewer Team	20 Dick Team	2NT S	5H	-3		300		-8	8
20 Dick Team	19 Brewer Team	3NT W	QS	-1	50			8	-8
21 McFadyen Team	13 Fermor Team	2 E	JD	=		110		7	-7
22 Jackson Team	15 De Luca Team	3 E	7D	=		140		8	-8
23 Moore Team	1 Crichton Team	1 E	JD	+1		110		5	-5
24 Duncan Team	29 Sim Team	3NT S	5H	-5		500		-7	7
25 Sutton Team	3 Janisz Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			11	-11
26 Gray Team	14 Melville Team	2X W	KS	=		470		-8	8
27 Ball Team	2 Collins Team	2 E	JD	=		110		-4	4
28 Gyde Team	16 McAllister Team	2 W	AH	=		110		1	-1
29 Sim Team	24 Duncan Team	2 S	9C	-2		200		7	-7
30 Kiss Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	3 E	2H	-2	100			2	-2
31 Jurgeleit Team	30 Kiss Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			-2	2
32 Brookes Team	4 Smith Team	2 E	JD	-1	50			6	-6
33 Gordon Team	35 McArthur Team	1 E	JD	+2		140		-5	5
34 Skousgaard Team	10 Wood Team	3 E	JD	-1	50			8	-8
35 McArthur Team	33 Gordon Team	2 E	KS	-1	50			5	-5
36 Butler Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 N	AC	-3		300		-5	5

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 12
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-2	100	1
3 by EW	-1	50	3
3 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	-1	50	2
3 by EW	-1	50	1
3NT by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	5
2 by EW	=	-110	1
1 by EW	+1	-110	1
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
1 by EW	+2	-140	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
1 by NS	-2	-200	1
2 by NS	-2	-200	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
2NT by NS	-3	-300	1
3NT by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
2 by NS	-3	-300	1
4 by NS	-4	-400	1
2X by EW	=	-470	2
3NT by NS	-5	-500	1
1X by NS	-2	-500	1

Alternative display format