Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
25 Sutton Team	3 Janisz Team	2X W	KC	=		670		-13	13
12 Cartner Team	17 Clark Team	2X W	QC	=		670		-15	15
16 McAllister Team	28 Gyde Team	3 S	QH	-2		200		0	0
31 Jurgeleit Team	30 Kiss Team	3NT N	2H	-2		200		-8	8
28 Gyde Team	16 McAllister Team	3NT N	2S	-2		200		0	0
26 Gray Team	14 Melville Team	5 S	QH	-2		200		-3	3
23 Moore Team	1 Crichton Team	2 W	JD	=		110		0	0
4 Smith Team	32 Brookes Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		-7	7
1 Crichton Team	23 Moore Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		0	0
6 Healy Team	7 Hayward Team	2 S	AC	-1		100		0	0
7 Hayward Team	6 Healy Team	3 N	QH	-1		100		0	0
11 Yeomans Team	9 Campbell Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		-6	6
14 Melville Team	26 Gray Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		3	-3
36 Butler Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 W	KC	-1	100			-1	1
5 Brown Team	18 Hutton Team	3 W	JD	-1	100			0	0
19 Brewer Team	20 Dick Team	3 S	QH	=	110			0	0
18 Hutton Team	5 Brown Team	3 S	QH	=	110			0	0
20 Dick Team	19 Brewer Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			0	0
27 Ball Team	2 Collins Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			-1	1
8 Tislevoll Team	36 Butler Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			1	-1
35 McArthur Team	33 Gordon Team	4 N	8H	=	130			-11	11
34 Skousgaard Team	10 Wood Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			-2	2
22 Jackson Team	15 De Luca Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			-9	9
13 Fermor Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 N	QH	=	130			-2	2
30 Kiss Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			8	-8
29 Sim Team	24 Duncan Team	2 S	KS	+2	130			-5	5
9 Campbell Team	11 Yeomans Team	4 S	QH	=	130			6	-6
2 Collins Team	27 Ball Team	1NT N	3S	+2	150			1	-1
10 Wood Team	34 Skousgaard Team	2 E	AD	-2	200			2	-2
3 Janisz Team	25 Sutton Team	2X W	KC	-1	200			13	-13
32 Brookes Team	4 Smith Team	2X W	JD	-1	200			7	-7
21 McFadyen Team	13 Fermor Team	2X W	8S	-1	200			2	-2
24 Duncan Team	29 Sim Team	2 E	KD	-3	300			5	-5
15 De Luca Team	22 Jackson Team	2X W	7S	-2	500			9	-9
17 Clark Team	12 Cartner Team	3NT N	2S	=	600			15	-15
33 Gordon Team	35 McArthur Team	3NT N	8H	+1	630			11	-11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+1	630	1
3NT by NS	=	600	1
2X by EW	-2	500	1
2 by EW	-3	300	1
2 by EW	-2	200	1
2X by EW	-1	200	3
1NT by NS	+2	150	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
4 by NS	=	130	2
3 by NS	+1	130	3
2 by NS	+2	130	1
1NT by NS	+1	120	3
3 by NS	=	110	2
3 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by NS	-1	-100	1
3NT by NS	-1	-100	4
2 by EW	=	-110	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	2
2X by EW	=	-670	2

Alternative display format