Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
23 Moore Team	1 Crichton Team	2 W	JD	=		110		0	0
27 Ball Team	2 Collins Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			-1	1
25 Sutton Team	3 Janisz Team	2X W	KC	=		670		-13	13
32 Brookes Team	4 Smith Team	2X W	JD	-1	200			7	-7
18 Hutton Team	5 Brown Team	3 S	QH	=	110			0	0
7 Hayward Team	6 Healy Team	3 N	QH	-1		100		0	0
6 Healy Team	7 Hayward Team	2 S	AC	-1		100		0	0
36 Butler Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 W	KC	-1	100			-1	1
11 Yeomans Team	9 Campbell Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		-6	6
34 Skousgaard Team	10 Wood Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			-2	2
9 Campbell Team	11 Yeomans Team	4 S	QH	=	130			6	-6
17 Clark Team	12 Cartner Team	3NT N	2S	=	600			15	-15
21 McFadyen Team	13 Fermor Team	2X W	8S	-1	200			2	-2
26 Gray Team	14 Melville Team	5 S	QH	-2		200		-3	3
22 Jackson Team	15 De Luca Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			-9	9
28 Gyde Team	16 McAllister Team	3NT N	2S	-2		200		0	0
12 Cartner Team	17 Clark Team	2X W	QC	=		670		-15	15
5 Brown Team	18 Hutton Team	3 W	JD	-1	100			0	0
20 Dick Team	19 Brewer Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			0	0
19 Brewer Team	20 Dick Team	3 S	QH	=	110			0	0
13 Fermor Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 N	QH	=	130			-2	2
15 De Luca Team	22 Jackson Team	2X W	7S	-2	500			9	-9
1 Crichton Team	23 Moore Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		0	0
29 Sim Team	24 Duncan Team	2 S	KS	+2	130			-5	5
3 Janisz Team	25 Sutton Team	2X W	KC	-1	200			13	-13
14 Melville Team	26 Gray Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		3	-3
2 Collins Team	27 Ball Team	1NT N	3S	+2	150			1	-1
16 McAllister Team	28 Gyde Team	3 S	QH	-2		200		0	0
24 Duncan Team	29 Sim Team	2 E	KD	-3	300			5	-5
31 Jurgeleit Team	30 Kiss Team	3NT N	2H	-2		200		-8	8
30 Kiss Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			8	-8
4 Smith Team	32 Brookes Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		-7	7
35 McArthur Team	33 Gordon Team	4 N	8H	=	130			-11	11
10 Wood Team	34 Skousgaard Team	2 E	AD	-2	200			2	-2
33 Gordon Team	35 McArthur Team	3NT N	8H	+1	630			11	-11
8 Tislevoll Team	36 Butler Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			1	-1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+1	630	1
3NT by NS	=	600	1
2X by EW	-2	500	1
2 by EW	-3	300	1
2 by EW	-2	200	1
2X by EW	-1	200	3
1NT by NS	+2	150	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
4 by NS	=	130	2
3 by NS	+1	130	3
2 by NS	+2	130	1
1NT by NS	+1	120	3
3 by NS	=	110	2
3 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by NS	-1	-100	1
3NT by NS	-1	-100	4
2 by EW	=	-110	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	2
2X by EW	=	-670	2

Alternative display format