Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Result	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 Crichton Team	23 Moore Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		0	0
2 Collins Team	27 Ball Team	1NT N	3S	+2	150			1	-1
3 Janisz Team	25 Sutton Team	2X W	KC	-1	200			13	-13
4 Smith Team	32 Brookes Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		-7	7
5 Brown Team	18 Hutton Team	3 W	JD	-1	100			0	0
6 Healy Team	7 Hayward Team	2 S	AC	-1		100		0	0
7 Hayward Team	6 Healy Team	3 N	QH	-1		100		0	0
8 Tislevoll Team	36 Butler Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			1	-1
9 Campbell Team	11 Yeomans Team	4 S	QH	=	130			6	-6
10 Wood Team	34 Skousgaard Team	2 E	AD	-2	200			2	-2
11 Yeomans Team	9 Campbell Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		-6	6
12 Cartner Team	17 Clark Team	2X W	QC	=		670		-15	15
13 Fermor Team	21 McFadyen Team	4 N	QH	=	130			-2	2
14 Melville Team	26 Gray Team	3NT N	8H	-1		100		3	-3
15 De Luca Team	22 Jackson Team	2X W	7S	-2	500			9	-9
16 McAllister Team	28 Gyde Team	3 S	QH	-2		200		0	0
17 Clark Team	12 Cartner Team	3NT N	2S	=	600			15	-15
18 Hutton Team	5 Brown Team	3 S	QH	=	110			0	0
19 Brewer Team	20 Dick Team	3 S	QH	=	110			0	0
20 Dick Team	19 Brewer Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			0	0
21 McFadyen Team	13 Fermor Team	2X W	8S	-1	200			2	-2
22 Jackson Team	15 De Luca Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			-9	9
23 Moore Team	1 Crichton Team	2 W	JD	=		110		0	0
24 Duncan Team	29 Sim Team	2 E	KD	-3	300			5	-5
25 Sutton Team	3 Janisz Team	2X W	KC	=		670		-13	13
26 Gray Team	14 Melville Team	5 S	QH	-2		200		-3	3
27 Ball Team	2 Collins Team	1NT N	8H	+1	120			-1	1
28 Gyde Team	16 McAllister Team	3NT N	2S	-2		200		0	0
29 Sim Team	24 Duncan Team	2 S	KS	+2	130			-5	5
30 Kiss Team	31 Jurgeleit Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			8	-8
31 Jurgeleit Team	30 Kiss Team	3NT N	2H	-2		200		-8	8
32 Brookes Team	4 Smith Team	2X W	JD	-1	200			7	-7
33 Gordon Team	35 McArthur Team	3NT N	8H	+1	630			11	-11
34 Skousgaard Team	10 Wood Team	3 S	QH	+1	130			-2	2
35 McArthur Team	33 Gordon Team	4 N	8H	=	130			-11	11
36 Butler Team	8 Tislevoll Team	2 W	KC	-1	100			-1	1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+1	630	1
3NT by NS	=	600	1
2X by EW	-2	500	1
2 by EW	-3	300	1
2 by EW	-2	200	1
2X by EW	-1	200	3
1NT by NS	+2	150	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
4 by NS	=	130	2
3 by NS	+1	130	3
2 by NS	+2	130	1
1NT by NS	+1	120	3
3 by NS	=	110	2
3 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by NS	-1	-100	1
3NT by NS	-1	-100	4
2 by EW	=	-110	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
3NT by NS	-2	-200	2
2X by EW	=	-670	2

Alternative display format